|
Burma: Reign of Terror in Burma
Requires Genuine U.N. Action - Not Just Official Visits
August 25, 2008 – (The Cutting Edge) On
July 27, Nhkum Hkawn Din, a 15 year-old school girl in Kachin State,
northern Burma, was brutally gang-raped and then murdered by Burma
Army soldiers. Her skull was crushed beyond recognition, her eyes
gouged out, her throat cut, she was stabbed in her right rib cage
and stomach, and all her facial features were obliterated. Her body
was found after a three-day search, naked and mutilated, 200 meters
from an army checkpoint near Nam Sai village, Bamaw District. She
was on her way to bring rice to her brother.
Against this backdrop, UN special envoy Ibrahim Gambari has just
completed another visit to Burma last week for more talks with the
country’s brutal, illegitimate military regime. But instead
of taking the regime to task for human rights violations, he spent
two days talking with the regime and its cronies, and just twenty
minutes with the leaders of Burma’s democracy movement, the
National League for Democracy (NLD). Even though his previous visits
have yielded no change in the junta’s behavior, and Burma’s
human rights record continues to deteriorate, Gambari rejected calls
from activists to drop the diplomatic niceties and photo-calls and
set out unambiguously the requirements for change.
Instead he spent time talking with groups such as the Union of Myanmar
Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI), the major
funder of the regime’s brutal proxy militia group "Swan-Arr-Shin”.
This group led the regime’s efforts in attacking and killing
peaceful monks and democracy activists during and after last September's
Saffron Revolution. According to the US Campaign for Burma, Gambari
also met with the Union Solidarity and Development Association,
a group comparable to Hitler's “Brown Shirts,” that
carried out an assassination attempt on Nobel Peace Prize recipient
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in May 2003. During that attack dozens of her
party members were killed. Also on his schedule was a meeting with
the National Unity Party, the military-backed political party that
lost severely to the NLD in 1990 elections -- gaining only 10 out
of 485 seats in parliament.
Since 1990, there have been 37 visits by UN envoys to Burma –
yet the crisis in the country has worsened in that time. More than
30 resolutions have been passed by the UN Human Rights Council and
General Assembly, and the Security Council has held past two presidential
statements, with little effect. Vague, timeless requests to the
junta to engage in dialogue with democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi
have led nowhere. She has spent more than 12 years under house arrest,
and her detention has been extended again. Earlier this year the
regime said she deserved to be “flogged”. The Generals
are not people who are persuaded at cocktail parties.
Gambari’s efforts have clearly failed. Now, activists say,
it is time for the UN to set out some specific benchmarks for progress
for the junta, accompanied by deadlines. The first benchmark should
be the release of political prisoners, who currently number over
2,000. Many are in extremely poor health due to bad prison conditions,
mistreatment, torture and the denial of medical care. In the past
20 years, 137 have died in custody. This year alone, there have
been 267 arbitrary arrests. The UN should insist that the Generals
release political prisoners before Ban Ki-moon’s visit to
Burma in December.
Further benchmarks should follow – such as an end to the military
offensive against civilians in eastern Burma which has destroyed
3,200 villages and displaced more than a million people since 1996,
and an end to the culture of impunity and the systematic and widespread
use of rape as a weapon of war against ethnic nationalities in Burma.
Over a thousand cases of rape have been documented in Burma’s
ethnic areas, and many more go unreported. The pattern is nationwide
– Kachin, Chin, Shan, Karen, Karenni and Mon women’s
organisations have all documented cases.
Last year four schoolgirls in Kachin state were gang-raped by Burma
Army soldiers – and then arrested and charged with prostitution
when they reported it. The UN Security Council has recognized rape
and sexual violence as a crime against humanity in Resolution 1820
passed on 19 June this year – something Mr. Gambari should
have reminded the Generals this week.
Setting benchmarks, with realistic deadlines, would enable Mr Gambari
– if he is kept in his post—to evaluate, incrementally,
the progress – or lack thereof – that he is making.
If the junta complies, so much the better. But if it continues with
its policies of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, bold
action should be taken.
A universal arms embargo should be imposed through the Security
Council – and maximum pressure placed on China and Russia
not to use their veto. Major financial centres such as Tokyo, Hong
Kong and Singapore, as well as the European Union, should impose
carefully targeted financial sanctions against the Generals’
personal assets and investments. And the international community
should stop the diplomatic charade and call the Generals by name
for what they are: criminals. The prosecution of Sudan’s leader
Omar al-Bashir and the capture of Radovan Karadzic have set a precedent.
Burma’s Generals are guilty of every imaginable crime against
humanity, and should be brought to account in the International
Criminal Court or through another jurisdiction.
The regime’s credentials to represent Burma in the UN should
also be challenged. The junta has no legitimacy, having overwhelmingly
lost elections in 1990, manifestly rigged a referendum on a new
constitution earlier this year, and proven itself criminally negligent
in its handling of Cyclone Nargis. The junta ignored 41 warnings
about the approaching cyclone, initially rejected international
offers of aid and then restricted, obstructed and diverted relief.
According to the UN, over a million cyclone victims have still not
received help. At least 2.5 million are still homeless and over
140,000 dead. And now the UN says the regime has been stealing millions
of dollars of aid money through its below-market fixed exchange
rates. Burma is the world’s second major opium producer and
a leading producer of amphetamines – and the regime is knee-deep
in drugs. The junta is unfit to govern, and there is a legitimate
alternative in the form of those elected in 1990 now living as a
government in exile.
These may seem drastic measures, but the situation is dire. The
regime has destroyed twice as many ethnic villages as in Darfur,
civilians are shot at point-blank range, and forced labour, torture
and the use of human minesweepers is widespread. Burma has the highest
number of forcibly conscripted child soldiers in the world. It is
widely believed that one reason the regime denied aid to some cyclone
victims was because they were Karen. The regime has been conducting
a campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Karen for decades, and
it may have used a natural disaster to assist in its efforts.
Last week, two Members of Parliament elected in 1990 were arrested
for signing a letter to Ban Ki-moon. Several other signatories went
into hiding. The letter refers to the Secretary-General’s
strong stand on Zimbabwe: “We applaud the courage of the Secretary-General
and his expression of moral authority … We expect [the] Secretary-General
[to] also stand for the rights of the people of Burma, who were
unable to express their real aspirations in the referendum.”
It continues: “At the very least, we don’t want the
United Nations siding with the dictators, and forcing the people
of Burma into an untenable position.”
The UN should not just call for the release of those arrested last
week – Ban Ki-moon and Gambari should read their letter carefully.
They should warn the Generals that if they do not change, calls
for such action will grow louder, and pressure on Burma’s
protectors – China, India, Thailand and the Association of
South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) – will only grow stronger.
The status quo is unsustainable, and Gambari’s record is a
failure. Both he and the junta need to change their act.
From:http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=713&pageid=16&pagename=Opinion
|