Scorecard of United States 2017-01-01 00:00:00

United States of America 2017
60.1

International Actions

61.7%
Security Council Actions

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in All Security Council Open Debates

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America had 17 out of 13 Open Debates in 2017 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 2/17

Conflict Prevention: 3/17

Disarmament: 2/17

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 4/17

Participation: 3/17

Peace Processes: 1/17

Peacekeeping: 3/17

Protection: 4/17

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/17

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 2/17

Implementation: 3/17

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 4/17

Human Rights: 3/17

S/PV.7938: "We know that an essential element of preventing sexual violence in the first place starts with empowering women to be leaders in building and maintaining peace."

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of all Security Council open debates per year.
Resources

"Meeting Records," United Nations Security Council, accessed April 11, 2018:

0.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Threats Caused by Terrorist Acts

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America had 0 out of 1 Open Debates on the threats caused by terrorist acts in 2017 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

N/A

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the threats caused by terrorist acts.
Resources

"Meeting Records," United Nations Security Council, accessed April 11, 2018:

80.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Maintenance of International Peace and Security

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America had 4 out of 5 Open Debates on the maintenance of international peace and security in 2017 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 0/5

Conflict Prevention: 1/5

Disarmament: 0/5

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 0/5

Participation: 0/5

Peace Processes: 0/5

Peacekeeping: 1/5

Protection: 2/5

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/5

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 1/5

Implementation: 2/5

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 2/5

Human Rights: 0/5

S/PV.8144: " To more comprehensively promote peace and protect human lives, we must look first at underlying challenges to peace and security, including a failure to promote development or human rights or to meet humanitarian needs. When left unaddressed, those shortcomings can develop into threats to international peace and security. Those factors can not only exacerbate conflict but, in many instances, directly lead to instability — a vicious cycle that is often largely man-made and preventable."

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the maintenance of international peace and security.
Resources

"Meeting Records," United Nations Security Council, accessed April 11, 2018:

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America had 1 out of 1 Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians in 2017 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 0/5

Conflict Prevention: 1/5

Disarmament: 0/5

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 0/5

Participation: 0/5

Peace Processes: 0/5

Peacekeeping: 1/5

Protection: 2/5

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/5

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 1/5

Implementation: 2/5

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 2/5

Human Rights: 0/5

S/PV.8144: " To more comprehensively promote peace and protect human lives, we must look first at underlying challenges to peace and security, including a failure to promote development or human rights or to meet humanitarian needs. When left unaddressed, those shortcomings can develop into threats to international peace and security. Those factors can not only exacerbate conflict but, in many instances, directly lead to instability — a vicious cycle that is often largely man-made and preventable."

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the protection of civilians.
Resources

"Meeting Records," United Nations Security Council, accessed April 11, 2018:

75.0%
The Use of Veto

CriteriaA state should not apply its veto right.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

The United States uesd its veto right 1 times out of 6 vetoed draft resolutions in 2017.

Comment

Draft resolutions on Palestine and the city of Jerusalem (S/2017/1060) has no gender-specific language.

Methodology100% - No veto right was used;
75% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
50% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
25% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language);
0% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language).
Resources

"Veto List," Dag Hammarskjold Library, accessed March 26, 2018:

15.4%
Commitments Intended to Strengthen the Implementation of the WPS Agenda

CriteriaAll WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered in the WPS commitments.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisIn its statements made at the 2017 Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security, the United States of America covered the following WILPF/PeaceWomen themes:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

Implementation:

The US signed the Women, Peace and Security Act of 2017 into law.

Relief and Recovery:

a) The US has helped spearhead the Women Entrepreneurs Finance Initiative, which already has $340 million in donor commitments.

b) The US will support women entrepreneurs in developing countries by increasing their access to finance, markets, technology and networks — everything they need to start and grow a business.

MethodologyThe number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes emphasised in a statement identifies the final percentage received by a state
Resources

"Call to Action on 2010 Commitments," WILPF/PeaceWomen, accessed July 19,. 2016:

"Meeting Records," United Nations Security Council, accessed April 11, 2018:

0.0%
Women, Peace and Security Financing

0.0%
Balance Between UN Women Total Contribution and Arms Sales Revenue

CriteriaTotal contribution to UN Women should increase overtime while Arms Sales Revenue should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Profit from Arms Transfer: $12,394,000,000

UN Women Total Contribution: $8,500,000

Comment

Profit from Arms Transfer in 2016: $9,894,000,000

UN Women Total Contribution in 2016: $14,898,379

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the arms transfer revenue and the UN Women contribution, etc.):
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (90-100%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (79-89%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (68-78%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (57-67%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (46-56%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (35-45%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (24-34%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (13-23%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (0-12%).
Resources

"UN Women 2017 Top Contributions by donor," UN Women, 2018. Acccessed May 15, 2018:

"Importer/Exporter TIV Tables," SIPRI. Acccessed May 15, 2018:

68.0%
International Gender and Human Rights Indicators

78.6%
Ranking via Gender Inequality Index (GII)

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Inequality Index (GII).
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America were ranked 41 among 188 participating countries in 2017.
Comment

HDI (Human Development Index)

The United States was ranked 13.

The United States is included in the "Very High Human Development" category.

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

"Human Development Report 2015," UNDP, 2014. Accessed May 8, 2017:

66.4%
Ranking via Global Gender Gap Index

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Gap Index.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America were ranked 49 among 144 participating countries in 2017.
Comment

N/A

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

"The Global Gender Gap Report 2017," World Economic Forum, 2010. Accessed April 11, 2018:

59.1%
Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties

CriteriaA state ratifies all international human rights gender-sensitive treaties.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America has signed and possibly ratified the following International Human Rights Treaties in 2017:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - signed
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - signed
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - signed
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - ratified
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - signed
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - ratified
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - signed
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - ratified
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - signed
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - ratified
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - signed
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - ratified
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - signed
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - ratified
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - signed
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - ratified
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - signed
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - ratified
Arms Trade Treaty - signed
Arms Trade Treaty - ratified
Comment

N/A

Methodology100% is received by a state that has signed and ratified all International Human Rights Treaties. Ratification of a treaty provides a state with a full point; a signature (without ratification) provides a state with half of a point.
11 - 99-100%;
10 - 90%;
9 - 81%;
8 - 72%;
7 - 63%;
6 - 54%;
5 - 45%;
4 - 36%;
3 - 27%;
2 - 18%;
1 - 9%;
0 - 0%
Resources

International HR Documents:

"International Stadnards," OHCHR, accessed September 5, 2016: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/SRWomen/Pages/InternationalStandards.aspx\

Status of Ratifications:

"Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General: Status of Treaties," United Nations Treaty Collection, accessed September 5, 2016:

"Status of Ratifications: Interactive Dashboard," OHCHR, accessed September 5, 2016: /

"ATT: Status of ratifications and accessions," amazonaws.com, accessed September 5, 2016:

62.8%
Peacekeeping Operations

25.5%
Contribution of Troops, Police and Military Experts

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in peacekeeping.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America provided 7 women out of 55 peacekeepers in 2017.
Comment

The United States provided female peacekeepers to MINUSCA (2 women), MINUSMA (2 women), MINUSTAH (2 women), MONUSCO (0 women), UNMIL (0 women), UNMISS (3 women), UNSMIL (0 women), UNTSO (0 women).

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in peacekeeping, a state that ensures 50% of its personnel are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a score that depends on the percentage of female personnel contributed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Data is provided by the United Nations (Department of Peacekeeping Operations).
Resources

"Summary of Military and Police Contribution to UN Operations," United Nations Peacekeeping, accessed April 11, 2018:

100.0%
Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) Allegedly Committed by Peacekeepers

CriteriaThere should be a "zero tolerance" policy with respect to sexual exploitation and abuse.
Note*: Information on SEA is gathered based on publicly available information. Official statistics are available starting from 2015.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

 

Peacekeepers from the United States were involved in 0 out of 62 allegations against civilian, military, police and other peacekeeping personnel in 2017.

Comment

S/PV.8218: "Peacekeeping missions need to support political solutions. They need host country cooperation. Mandates must be realistic and achievable. Missions need to have an exit strategy. And we need to be willing to change mandates when things are not working."

MethodologyIn line with the UN "zero tolerance" policy, at least one allegation of sexual abuse provides a state with 0%.
states that have not been involved in the SEA allegations receives 100%.
Resources

"Meeting Records," United Nations Security Council, accessed April 11, 2018:

"Allegations by Category of Personnel Per Year (Sexual Exploitation and Abuse)," United Nations Conduct and Discipline Unit, accessed April 11, 2018::

National Actions

46.2%
Prevention

60.0%
Partnership Between Womens Civil Society Organisations and the Government

CriteriaThere should be a funded and governmentally-supported women's civil society landscape.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Governmental support for women's civil society:

- Engagement in joint government/NGO efforts: Yes

- Funding provided by the government: Yes

The United States receives 60% because: Even though the government is engaged in collaboration with women's civil society, it does not provide adequate financial support to women's organisations, the number of projects and conferences on the Women, Peace and Security Agenda in existence is low, civil society space for rights-focused activists (i.e.: racial equality and women's reproductive health-focused activisim and advoacy) is increasingly limited, and mass-surveillance in accordance with national security and anti-terrorism efforts restricts civil society freedoms (i.e.: freedom of the press, freedom of public association).

Comment

 

Key women's organisation's (National Organisation for Women) efforts in regard to gender issues include the following:

- Number of conferences: 1 national annual conference, with 500 local and campus affiliates in all 50 states and the District of Columbia hosting numerous conferences and events per year;

- Social services provided: advocacy for reproductive rights and justice, economic justice, ending violence against women, racial justice, LGBTQ rights, and constitutional equality, training and education, lobbying and policymaking.

Types of social support provided:

Education: Yes

Anti-violence: Yes

Women's empowerment: Yes

Gender-related training: Yes

Political participation: Yes

Anti-human trafficking: No

Women's health: Yes

Lobbying and policymaking: Yes

Fundraising: Yes

More than 1.5 million NGOs operate in the United States. These NGOs undertake a wide array of activities, including political advocacy on issues such as foreign policy, elections, the environment, healthcare, women’s rights, economic development, and many other issues. Human services groups—such as food banks, homeless shelters, youth services, sports organisations, and family or legal services—composed over one-third of all public charities (35.5 percent).

The US is rated as "narrowed" on the CIVICUS Monitor & has been placed on the Monitor’s Watch List due to alarming developments. The United States in turn was placed under closer scrutiny as nineteen state legislatures either proposed or passed bills to limit certain protest tactics or increase penalties for ‘illegal’ protests. Various local police departments are also reportedly conducting surveillance of protesters, including members of the Black Lives Matter movement and those arrested during President Donald Trump’s inauguration. This is in addition to the repression and arbitrary arrests experienced in 2016 by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe members and activists protesting against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Later reports confirmed that the Inauguration Day protests had been infiltrated by undercover police agents. It was also reported that two-thirds of US non-profits working internationally have experienced banking issues as a result of recent anti-money laundering and terror-financing laws.

MethodologyWhen there is both financial support from the government and active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 80% to 100% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is either only financial support from the government or only active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 60% to 79% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and where there are no restrictions applied on womens organisation, a state receives from 40% to 59% depending on circumstances (i.e.: kinds of services provided by civil society, etc.);

When there is neither both financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when government provides services for women, a state receives from 20% to 39% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when there are several restrictions on civil society, a state receives from 0% to 19% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.).
Resources

“Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the United States,” U.S. Department of State, 2017. Accessed May 14, 2018:

“Civic Space in the Americas: 2017,” CIVICUS, 2017. Accessed May 14, 2018:

“The Nonprofit Sector in Brief 2015: Public Charities, Giving, and Volunteering”, Urban Institute, 2015. Accessed May 14, 2018:

40.0%
Special Gender-Specific Training of Security and Law Enforcement Personnel

CriteriaSpecial gender-specific training for law enforcement and security sector should exist.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America implemented the following training standards in 2017:
Assessment of gender-sensitive training is present
Overall training objective is gender sensitive
Gender parity among trainers and trainees
Women's organisations or gender-related societal leaders are engaged to provide contextual perspective on gender within the security sector
Follow-up communication and gender-related knowledge dissemination methods are established
Comment

Department of Defense Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan 2012-2017: “The Foreign Service Institute trained foreign and civil service officers on gender policies, including WPS, and launched an online training module on gender equality as a foreign policy priority, which significantly expanded its reach. In addition, several bureaus and missions developed specialized positions for gender advisors, coordinated gender policies through devoted working groups, drafted country-specific gender strategies, implemented specialized in-country training, and integrated WPS-related material into existing training. The Secretary of State’s Full Participation Fund, an initiative that promotes gender mainstreaming across the Department, supported 16 active programs in conflict-affected countries.”

MethodologyThe criteria is determined in line with the UN Women guidelines (developed in partnership with the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) and the European Union).
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources

“Gender Awareness Training: A Comparison of U.S. Military Units to NATO/PFP Military Units”, Old Dominion University, Fall 2016. Accessed May 14, 2018.

“Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan 2012-2017”, U.S. Department of Defense, 2012. Accessed May 14, 2018.

84.6%
National Action Plan on the Implementation of UNSC Resolution 1325 bases on WPS Themes

CriteriaA state has implemented a 1325 National Action Plan. All WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America implements UNSC Resolution 1325 and covers following Peacewomen Themes 2017:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

In June 2016, the United States of America (USA) adopted their second NAP which was developed on the basis of reviewing policy and programming as well as challenges and lessons learned from the implementation of the first NAP. Consultations were also held with civil society stakeholders during the drafting of the revised NAP. Recently, the USA enacted the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, which was signed into law on October 6. The USA NAP is unique in setting a timeline for the three main departments in charge of implementation - Department of State, Department of Defense, and USAID – to develop their own departmental implementation plans. In August 2012 both State and USAID launched their organizational action plans. Moreover, the NAP mentions that the Interagency Policy Committee dedicated to Women, Peace and Security (WPS IPC) will later develop specific indicators for the purpose of monitoring implementation. Thus, the USA NAP comes across as relatively unspecific because it delegates issues to the future. The revised NAP of the USA has the following five objectives:

National Integration and Institutionalization: Through interagency coordination, policy development, enhanced professional training and education, and evaluation, the United States Government will institutionalize a gender-responsive approach to its diplomatic, development, and defense-related work in conflict-affected environments.

Participation in Peace Processes and Decision-making: The United States Government will improve the prospects for inclusive, just, and sustainable peace by promoting and strengthening women’s rights and effective leadership and substantive participation in peace processes, conflict prevention, peacebuilding, transitional processes, and decision-making institutions in conflict-affected environments.

Protection from Violence: The United States Government will strengthen its efforts to prevent —and protect women and children from—harm, exploitation, discrimination, and abuse, including gender-based violence and trafficking in persons, and to hold perpetrators accountable in conflict-affected environments.

Conflict Prevention: The United States Government will promote women’s roles in preventing conflict, mass atrocities, and violent extremism, including by improving conflict early-warning and response systems through the integration of gender perspectives, and invest in women and girls’ health, education, and economic opportunity to create conditions for stable societies and lasting peace.

Access to Relief and Recovery: The United States Government will respond to the distinct needs of women and girls in both natural and conflict-affected disasters and crises, including by providing safe, equitable access to humanitarian assistance. Source: http://peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/women-national-action-plan.pdf

MethodologyThe grade is determined on the basis of a number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes that are emphasized in a 1325 National Action Plan (NAP). A NAP that emphasizes all WILPF/PeaceWomen themes receives 100%.

0.0%
Balance between the 1325 National Action Plan (NAP) Budget and Military Expenditure.

CriteriaThe 1325 National Action Plan budget should increase overtime while military expenditure should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Military Expenditure: $605,803,000,000

The NAP contains no allocated or estimated budget.

Comment

Military Expenditure in 2016: $612,889,000,000

The NAP contains no allocated or estimated budget.

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the NAP budget and military expenditure, etc.):

NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure decreases (90-100%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure does not change (79-89%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure decreases (68-78%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure does not change (57-67%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure decreases (46-56%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure increases (35-45%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure does not change (24-34%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure increases (13-23%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure increases (1-12%)
No NAP/No NAP Budget (0%)
Resources

"SIPRI Military Expenditure Database," SIPRI, accessed June 3, 2019. 

"Member States," WILPF/PeaceWomen, accessed June 3, 2019. 

56.3%
Participation

38.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Parliament

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in Parliament.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Women made up 19% of Parliament in the United States of America in 2017.

Comment

 

Lower: 19.4%; Upper: 21%

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in Parliament, a state that ensures 50% of its parliamentarians are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female parliamentarians employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

“Women in National Parliaments,” Inter Parliamentary Union, April 2018. Accessed May 14, 2018:

32.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Ministerial Positions

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in ministerial positions.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

16,7% of ministerial positions were held by women in the United States of America in 2017.

Comment

Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 0.200

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the ministerial positions, a state that ensures 50% of its ministers are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female ministers employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

“The Global Gender Gap Report 2017,” World Economic Forum, 2017. Accessed May 14, 2018:

53.6%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Law Enforcement

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in law enforcement
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

26.8% of law enforcement positions were held by women in the United States of America in 2017.

Comment

Women represent 26.8% of the US federal law enforcement jobs. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in law enforcement, a state that ensures 50% of its law enforcement agents are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female law enforcement agents employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

"Full-time US Law Enforcement Employees," U.S. Department of Justice, Accessed November 20, 2019. 

54.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Judiciary

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in the judiciary.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

27,1% of judges in the United States of America were women in 2017.

Comment

US Supreme Court: 3 women, 37.5%

Circuit Court of Appeals: 35.9%

Federal District Court Judges: 33%

All State court judges in US: 31.1%

Total representation of women - federal & state judgeships: 27.1%

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the judiciary, a state that ensures 50% of its judges are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female judges employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

“A Current Glance at Women in the Law: January 2017”, American Bar Association, 2017. Accessed May 14, 2018:

66.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Labour Force

CriteriaWomen should have equal access to employment opportunities.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

 

Women's labour participation rate was 66.2%

Comment

Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 0.86

Unemployment rate (percentage of female/male labour force): Female: 4.8% Male: 4.9% Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 0.97

Estimated earned income (PPP US$): Female: 45,287 Male: 69,901 Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 0.65

Legislators, senior officials, and managers (%): Female: 43.4, Male: 56.6 Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 0.77

Professional and technical workers (%): Female: 57.1, Male: 42.9 Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 1.33

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) on the basis of its methodology.
Resources

 

“The Global Gender Gap Report 2017,” World Economic Forum, 2017. Accessed May 14, 2018:

94.0%
Access to Education

CriteriaThere should be equal access to all levels of education.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Enrolment in primary education: 94.1%

Enrolment in secondary education: 92%

Enrolment in tertiary education: 99.6%

Comment

 

The enrolment difference between males and females is provided below (The theoretical maximum value is 100%. Increasing trends are considered a reflection of improving coverage at the specified level of education):

Literacy rate (%): Female: 99 Male: 99 Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 1

Enrolment in primary education Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 1.01 Female: 94.1 Male: 93.4

Enrolment in secondary education Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 1.03 Female:92.0 Male:89.0

Enrolment in tertiary education Ratio (0 = Inequality, 1 = Equality): 1.37 Female: 99.6 Male: 72.8

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) and UNESCO, developed on the basis of their respective methodologies.
Resources

 

“The Global Gender Gap Report 2017,” World Economic Forum, 2017. Accessed May 14, 2018:

90.9%
Protection

77.8%
Presence of Gendered Perspective in Legal Framework

CriteriaGender should be mainstreamed throughout legal framework in accordance with the international law.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis Legal framework in the United States of America includes the following gender-sensitive laws and constitutional provisions in 2017:
Women and men are guaranteed the rights to vote, to hold public office, and to exercise public functions
Gender perspective incorporated into the constitution
Women and men are guaranteed the right to non-discrimination in education, employment and economic, and social activities
Women and men are guaranteed full equality in civil and business matters
Women and men are guaranteed equal rights and obligations with regard to choice of spouse, parenthood, personal rights, and command over property
Women and men are guaranteed reproductive rights
Women and men are guaranteed equal pay for equal work
Women and men are guaranteed the right to live lives free from violence
Gender sensitive laws and constitutional previsions
Comment

Legal Framework:

Equal Pay Act, 1963;

Civil Rights Act, 1964;

The affirmative action policy of 1965 was expanded in 1967 to cover women as well as racial minorities;

Roe v. Wade, 1973; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;

Sex-segregated job advertisements were declared illegal by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1968), upheld by the Supreme Court in 1973;

Title IX of the Education Amendment, 1972;

1986, in the decision of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, sexual harassment was established as illegal and discriminatory;

The Family Medical Leave Act, 1993; Violence Against Women Act, 1994; Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, 2009. Presence a non-discrimination by sex clause in the constitution of the United States of America:

- The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. (Amendment XIX). The U.S. Constitution does not guarantee equal rights for women.

Methodology8 - 100%
7 - 87.5%
6 - 75%
5 - 62.5%
4 - 50%
3 - 37.5%
2 - 25%
1 - 12.5%
0 - 0%

Necessary legal framework is determined in accordance with the principles of the core human rights treaties (i.e.: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)).
Resources

Imbornoni, Ann-Marie. "Timeline of key events in the American women's rights movement 1980-present," Pearson Education, Inc., accessed May 3, 2018:

"Global Gender Equality Constitutional Database," UN Women, accessed May 3, 2018:

"Constitutional Provisions on Women's Equality," Library of Congress, accessed May 3, 2018:

"Federal Domestic Violence Laws," The Unite States Attorney's Office, accessed May 3, 2018:

"The Equal Pay Act of 1963," U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed May 3, 2018:

85.7%
Access to Justice

CriteriaWomen's unrestricted access to justice exists.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis The following protections are guaranteed by the United States of America in 2017:
Equal access to formal legal dispute systems and the right to legal representation
Non-discrimination law
Existence of courts and judicial bodies
Financial affordability of access to legal proceedings and/or legal aid
Free access to an interpreter during legal proceedings
Victim protection
Existence of gender units within justice institutions
Comment

Only 3 out of 9 Supreme Court judges in the US are women.

There is also no legislation that specifically criminalises marital rape, even though victims can file complaints against their spouses for sexual assault or rape.

MethodologyThe necessary protections represent the CEDAW standard on women's access to justice.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%"
Resources

Mathews, Roderick B., Juan Carlos Botero. "Access to Justice in the United States Findings from the Newly Released Rule of Law Index of the World Justice Project," World Justice Project, December, 2010. Accessed May 3, 2018:

"Access to Justice in the United States: Ensuring Meaningful Access to Counsel in Civil Cases," Columbia University, Accessed May 3, 2018:

'Women, Business and the Law Report", Accessed May 3, 2018:

100.0%
Protections Against Human Trafficking

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America in 2017 is in:
Complete compliance with the minimum standards
Partial compliance with the minimum standards
Non-compliance with the minimum standards
Comment

The U.S. government fully complies with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. The government sustained strong law enforcement efforts and continued to encourage a victim-centreed approach among local, state, and federal law enforcement.

MethodologyAdherence is measured in accordance with the “Palermo Protocols” and grading system developed by the US state Department’s annual report on trafficking in persons.
Full compliance: 100%
Partial Compliance: 50%
Non-Compliance: 0%

100.0%
Protections Against Sexual Violence.

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of sexual violence.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America in 2017 has the following services in place:
Existence of a law against sexual violence
Governmental efforts to eliminate sexual violence nationally
Existence of a national crisis hotline
Existence of women's shelters
Existence of women's rape crisis centres
Comment

Most reliable information based on point-in-time census counts on one specific day each year, with research focusing on victims/survivors helped rather than specific numbers of shelters/centres.

In 2017, 11,441 unmet Requests for Services in One Day, of which 7,416 (65%) were for Housing Victims made 11,441 requests for services – including emergency shelter, housing, transportation, childcare, legal representation, and more – that could not be provided because programs lacked the resources to meet victims’ needs.

MethodologyThe standard is derived from the CEDAW and Istanbul Convention.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources

"Domestic Violence Counts 2016," National Network to End Domestic Violence, 2017. Accessed May 3, 2018:

"Domestic Violence Counts: 12th Annual Census Report", National Network to End Domestic Violence, 2018. Accessed July 12,2018.

95.0%
Recovery Support

80.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes Serving the Needs of Veterans

CriteriaDedicated programmes for female veterans should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America in 2017 provides the following services:
Female veterans affairs offices exist in urban and rural areas
Economic benefits (i.e. disability, housing) exist
Health service benefits (i.e. free veterans health insurance, gender-sensitive PTSD care) exist
Educational benefits exist
Employment services exist
Comment

N/A

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the international concept of the responsibility to protect. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%

Resources

"Center for Women Veterans (CWV)," U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, accessed May 3, 2018:

"Veterans," U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, accessed May 3, 2018:

"Women Veterans," U.S. Department of Labor, accessed May 3, 2018:

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Sexual Violence

CriteriaDedicated programmes for survivors of sexual violence should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America in 2017 provides the following services:
National crisis hotline
Women's shelters
Women's rape crisis centres
Counseling services
National sex-offender list or website
Support groups for victims/survivors
Comment

N/A

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the CEDAW, Istanbul Convention and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
6 - 100%
5 - 83%
4 - 66%
3 - 49%
2 - 32%
1 - 15%
0 - 0%.
Resources

"National Statistics," National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, accessed May 3, 2018:

"Get the Facts & Figures," National Domestic Violence Hotline, accessed May 3, 2018:

"Domestic Violence," Feminist Majority Hotline, accessed May 3, 2018:

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Human Trafficking

CriteriaDedicated programmes for urvivors of human trafficking should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America in 2017 provides the following services:
Human trafficking hotline
Human trafficking shelter
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.)
Health services
Legal services
Job training programmes
Educational services
Comment

In addition to reporting the number of survivors served in one day, responding women shelter programs report on the number of requests they received that they could not meet. Nearly 12,00011 requests for services were unmet due to a lack of program resources. Domestic violence programs and shelters across the country are operating with less funding, fewer resources, and even fewer staff. The economic environment of the last decade has resulted in a combination of fewer private funds, fewer community donations, and reduced state and local funding. While some funding streams have been increased at the federal level, the distribution of those funds had not yet reached most programs by September 14, 2016. This long-term shortage of resources has been compounded by a reduction in funding for other social services upon which victims often rely, such as low-income housing, mental health services, and more.

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with Palermo Protocol and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources

"Traffciking in Persons Report 2017," U.S. Department of State, Accessed May 3, 2018:

100.0%
Implementation Dedicated Programmes to Support Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)

CriteriaDedicated programmes for refugees, asylum seekers, and IDPs should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United States of America in 2017 provides the following services:
State refugee/IDP strategy exists
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.) are provided
Health services are available
Legal services are available
Job training programmes are available
Educational services are available
Community engagement/integration programmes are available
Comment

Total population of refugees, stateless persons, IDPs, and asylum-seekers: x. According to US Homeland Security, y (z%) female refugees were admitted into the United States.

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) recommendations. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources

"Refugee Resettlement in the United States," US Department of State, accessed May 28, 2019.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS) "2017 Annual Flow Report", January 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019