Scorecard of France 2018-01-01 00:00:00

France 2018
78.9

International Actions

80.3%
Security Council Actions

93.8%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in All Security Council Open Debates

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance had 15 out of 16 Open Debates in 2018 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security:  3/16

Conflict Prevention:  2/16

Disarmament:  3/16

Displacement and Humanitarian Response:  4/16

Participation: 5/16

Peace Processes: 5/16

Peacekeeping: 5/16

Protection: 5/16

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/16

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 4/16

Implementation: 6/16

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 12/16

Human Rights: 6/16

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of all Security Council open debates per year.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

n/a
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Threats Caused by Terrorist Acts

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisInformation is currently not available.
Comment

N/A

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the threats caused by terrorist acts.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Maintenance of International Peace and Security

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance had 4 out of 4 Open Debates on the maintenance of international peace and security in 2018 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 1/4

Conflict Prevention:1/4

Disarmament: 1/4

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 0/4

Participation: 2/4

Peace Processes: 0/4

Peacekeeping: 1/4

Protection: 0/4

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/4

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 0/4

Implementation: 2/4

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 3/4

Human Rights: 2/4

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the maintenance of international peace and security.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance had 1 out of 1 Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians in 2018 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 0/1

Conflict Prevention: 0/1

Disarmament: 0/1

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 1/1

Participation: 0/1

Peace Processes: 0/1

Peacekeeping: 1/1

Protection: 1/1

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/1

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 1/1

Implementation: 0/1

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 1/1

Human Rights: 1/1

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the protection of civilians.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

100.0%
The Use of Veto

CriteriaA state should not apply its veto right.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

N/A 

Comment

N/A

Methodology100% - No veto right was used;
75% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
50% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
25% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language);
0% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language).
Resources

1. Veto List, The United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 29 2019. 

7.7%
Commitments Intended to Strengthen the Implementation of the WPS Agenda

CriteriaAll WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered in the WPS commitments.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisIn its statements made at the 2018 Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security, France covered the following WILPF/PeaceWomen themes:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

In 2018, France identified a renewed commitment to implementation: France developed its third national plan of action for the WPS agenda, which was presented in the first quarter of 2019, and France committed to making the agenda a priority of its presidency of the Security Council in 2019. 

In addition to identifying new commitments in 2018, France provided the following updates on its 2017 commitments: 

SGBV: France has supported the inclusion of a specific criterion on sexual violence in the sanctions regime concerning the Central African Republic and the inclusion of gender-related issues in the mandate of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic, which in many respects is a model to follow. Protection: In Syria, France funded an initiative to provide emergency medical assistance to protect women in a conflict where they are too often targeted, in particular through assistance in terms of sexual and reproductive health or psychological support services designed to improve the living conditions of women, especially those giving birth in very difficult conditions. Implementation: In Libya, France has supported training workshops for young entrepreneurs in Misrata, 50 per cent of whom were women, with the aim of strengthening the Libyan econom

MethodologyThe number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes emphasised in a statement identifies the final percentage received by a state
Resources

1. Call to Action on 2015 Commitments [homepage, where commitments for years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 are located], WILPF, 2015. Accessed May 29 2019. 

2. UNSC WPS Debate Commitments 2018 [PDF of WILPF analysis], WILPF, 2018. Accessed May 29 2019. 

90.0%
Women, Peace and Security Financing

90.0%
Balance Between UN Women Total Contribution and Arms Sales Revenue

CriteriaTotal contribution to UN Women should increase overtime while Arms Sales Revenue should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

UN Women Contribution increased; Arms Transfer Revenue decreased.

France recieves the lowest score within the top tier because, though it has "ticked the boxes," France remains among the top five global military spenders in 2018. 

Arms Transfer Revenue in 2018: $196,000,000

UN Women Government Total Contribution in 2018: $740,000

Military Expenditure: $63.8 billion. 

Comment

Arms Transfer Revenue in 2017: $2,162,000,000

UN Women Government Total Contribution in 2017: $680,000

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the arms transfer revenue and the UN Women contribution, etc.):
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (90-100%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (79-89%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (68-78%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (57-67%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (46-56%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (35-45%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (24-34%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (13-23%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (0-12%).
Resources

1.     "Core Resources: Top 25 Donors 2018," UN Women, 2018. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

2.     "Importer/Exporter TIV Tables," Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

3.     "Arms Transfers and Military Spending," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

4.     "Trends in World Military Expenditure," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

5.     "Trends in International Arms Transfers," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

90.3%
International Gender and Human Rights Indicators

92.0%
Ranking via Gender Inequality Index (GII)

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Inequality Index (GII).
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance was ranked 16 among 189 participating countries in 2018.
Comment

In 2017, France was ranked 16 of 189 countries. 

Researcher's note: The 2019 Human Development Report will not be released until November 2019, as it is being significantly re-envisioned in order to "go beyond the dominant discourse focused on income disparities."

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

1. "Human Development Reports: Table 5: Gender Inequality Index," The United Nations Development Programme, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2019. 

92.6%
Ranking via Global Gender Gap Index

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Gap Index.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance was ranked 12 among 149 participating countries in 2018.
Comment

N/A 

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [France, p. 101], 2019. Accessed May 29 2019.

86.4%
Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties

CriteriaA state ratifies all international human rights gender-sensitive treaties.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance has signed and possibly ratified the following International Human Rights Treaties in 2018:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - signed
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - signed
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - signed
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - ratified
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - signed
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - ratified
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - signed
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - ratified
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - signed
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - ratified
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - signed
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - ratified
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - signed
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - ratified
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - signed
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - ratified
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - signed
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - ratified
Arms Trade Treaty - signed
Arms Trade Treaty - ratified
Comment

N/A

Methodology100% is received by a state that has signed and ratified all International Human Rights Treaties. Ratification of a treaty provides a state with a full point; a signature (without ratification) provides a state with half of a point.
11 - 99-100%;
10 - 90%;
9 - 81%;
8 - 72%;
7 - 63%;
6 - 54%;
5 - 45%;
4 - 36%;
3 - 27%;
2 - 18%;
1 - 9%;
0 - 0%
Resources
  1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "The Yearbook of the United Nations, 1948-1949: Part I, Section V.: Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Questions," pp. 529-530, The United Nations Department of Public Information, 1950. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1976; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1976; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: 1981; Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: 2000: "Status of Ratification: Interactive Dashboard," United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 2014. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  3. "Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  4. "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  5. "Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  6. "Geneva Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war," The United Nations, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  7. Additional Protocol II: "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977," International Committee of the Red Cross, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 
  8. Arms Trade Treaty: "Arms Trade Treaty," United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 

 

57.0%
Peacekeeping Operations

14.0%
Contribution of Troops, Police and Military Experts

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in peacekeeping.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance provided 52 women out of 744 peacekeepers in 2018.
Comment

Contintent Troops: 615 men, 47 women, 662 total.

Experts on Mission: 2 men, 0 women, 2 total. 

Individual Police: 28 men, 4 women, 32 total. 

Staff officers, 47 men, 1 woman, 48 total. 

Total, peacekeepers provided: 692 men, 52 women, 744 total. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in peacekeeping, a state that ensures 50% of its personnel are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a score that depends on the percentage of female personnel contributed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Data is provided by the United Nations (Department of Peacekeeping Operations).
Resources
  1. "Contributors to UN Peacekeeping Operations by Country and Post," United Nations Peacekeeping. Accessed May 28, 2019. 
  2. "Summary of Contributions to Peackeeping by Mission, Country and Post," United Nations Peacekeeping. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

 

100.0%
Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) Allegedly Committed by Peacekeepers

CriteriaThere should be a "zero tolerance" policy with respect to sexual exploitation and abuse.
Note*: Information on SEA is gathered based on publicly available information. Official statistics are available starting from 2015.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

French peacekeepers did not commit any of the 54 alleged sexual abuse and exploitation incidents in 2018. 

Comment

N/A 

MethodologyIn line with the UN "zero tolerance" policy, at least one allegation of sexual abuse provides a state with 0%.
states that have not been involved in the SEA allegations receives 100%.
Resources
  1. "Conduct in UN Field Missions: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse: Allegations," The United Nations, 2018. Accessed 28 May 2019. [To obtain total # of allegations.]
  2. "Conduct in UN Field Missions: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse: Alleged Perpetrators," The United Nations, 2018. Access 28 May 2019. [To obtain total # of perpetrators.]

 

National Actions

60.6%
Prevention

90.0%
Partnership Between Womens Civil Society Organisations and the Government

CriteriaThere should be a funded and governmentally-supported women's civil society landscape.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

 

Our analysis of states' support is founded on our analysis of governments' public remarks surrounding, commitments, partnerships with and actions taken to advance the position of civil society, as reported by the civil society, reputable media outlets and the governments themselves. We found that, in 2018, France engaged in joint government/NGO efforts and allocated funding to civil society, thus meeting the minimum standards for receipt of a top-tier grade. 

In terms of provision of official development assistance (ODA), which measures the grant equivalent of aid loans (the “gift portion” of the loans), France was the fifth largest donor. Though the sum total of their donations increased (USD 12.2 billion in 2018, from USD 11.1 billion in 2017), the percentage of gross national income comprised by ODA (0.43%) remained stagnant. In its International Strategy on Gender Equality (2018-2022), France identifies as its objectives to "increase and improve integration of gender equality in ODA" and "strengthen the accountability of ODA that supports gender equality." As of the end of 2016-- the most recent year for which such statistics are available (which is, as recognised in the governments' objectives, problematic from an accountability perspective)--  French ODA with a gender focus accounted for 28% of bilateral ODA.

France took several steps forward in some areas (as, for example, in its International Strategy on Gender Equality) while taking several steps back in others (as, for example, in allowing its percentage of ODA-GNI to stagnate and allowing measurement indicators used for accountability to lapse) but acknowledged its gaps and established measurable targets for upcoming years. As France has taken steps to identify gaps (and established a clear framework for surmounting them), France retains its grade from 2017 (still the highest mark among the P5).

Comment

 

Spotlight: Grassroots. To better understand the nature and extent of partnership between women-led civil society and the government, WILPF performs a more in-depth analysis of the actions, efforts and impact of each nation's leading women's organisation(s). For our study of France, WILPF examined La Coordination française pour le lobby européen des femmes (or CLEF).

CLEF is a membership organisation that functions as an umbrella body for women's charities, with over 60 members. CLEF brings together women-led NGOs to be more effective and sustainable through the provision of training, information, resources and one-to-one support on a range of organisational development issues while also lobbying decision makers on behalf of the women’s not-for-profit sector for improved representation and funding. 

In 2018, CLEF published eight press releases, prepared four official correspondences (respectively, to the President, the Parliament, the Minister for Gender Equality, and a general "Gender Parity" alert), published a piece in the Huffington Post and presented a statement surrounding the Commission on the Status of Women to United Nations Social and Economic Council (a feature of CLEF's work since 2010). Mobilisation and support for its member organisations included the participation and organisation of two social media campaigns and 10+ events, trainings and conferences.

In terms of service provision, CLEF's focus remained consistent in 2018: to strengthen coordination across women-led NGOs (through the organisation and promotion of coordination/networking/information-sharing events and trainings) and improve upon and oversee the implementation of national, regional and international policies/legislation.Either as an umbrella organisation or way of its members (or both), CLEF supports the provision of the services in the following areas: education, anti-violence, women's empowerment, gender-related training, political participation, anti-human trafficking, women's health, lobbying and policymaking and fundraising.

CLEF's list of institutional partners include the Minister for Gender Equality's office, the Mayor's office (Paris), and the National Consultative Commission of Human Rights (CNCDH).

MethodologyWhen there is both financial support from the government and active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 80% to 100% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is either only financial support from the government or only active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 60% to 79% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and where there are no restrictions applied on womens organisation, a state receives from 40% to 59% depending on circumstances (i.e.: kinds of services provided by civil society, etc.);

When there is neither both financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when government provides services for women, a state receives from 20% to 39% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when there are several restrictions on civil society, a state receives from 0% to 19% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.).
Resources

  1. "Official Development Assistance 2018: Preliminary Data," OECD, 2019. Accessed June 13, 2019. 

  2. "Detailed Summary: Development aid drops in 2018, especially to neediest countries," OECD Development Assistance Committee, 2019. Accessed June 13, 2019.

  3. "Statuts d'association loi de 1901," la CLEF, 2019. Accessed June 12, 2019. 

  4. "Towards a World in Common," Agence Française de Développement, 2018. Accessed June 13, 2019. 

  5. "Nous sommes..." Femmes Solidaires, 2019. Accessed June 13, 2019.

60.0%
Special Gender-Specific Training of Security and Law Enforcement Personnel

CriteriaSpecial gender-specific training for law enforcement and security sector should exist.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance implemented the following training standards in 2018:
Assessment of gender-sensitive training is present
Overall training objective is gender sensitive
Gender parity among trainers and trainees
Women's organisations or gender-related societal leaders are engaged to provide contextual perspective on gender within the security sector
Follow-up communication and gender-related knowledge dissemination methods are established
Comment

N/A 

MethodologyThe criteria is determined in line with the UN Women guidelines (developed in partnership with the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) and the European Union).
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources

  1. "National Action Plan For France: Implementation of the 'Women, Peace and Security' resolutions of the United Nations Security Council (2015-2018)," WILPF/PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed June 13, 2019. 

  2. "Rapport annuel d'activites 2018," Le Défenseur des Droits, 2019 [especially, pps. 59 - 69]. Accessed June 13, 2019. 

  3. "Gender and Security Training Manual," UN Women et. al., 2012. Accessed June 13, 2019.

  4. "Handbook on police accountability, oversight and integrity," United Nations Office of Drug and Crime, 2011[useful for gleaning some best practices and better understanding WILPF's applied standards, especially at pps.15, 34, 43, 50, 79-85]. Accessed June 13, 2019.

  5. Good Practices in Basic Police Training – Curricula Aspects,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 2009. Accessed June 13, 2019.

92.3%
National Action Plan on the Implementation of UNSC Resolution 1325 bases on WPS Themes

CriteriaA state has implemented a 1325 National Action Plan. All WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance implements UNSC Resolution 1325 and covers following Peacewomen Themes 2018:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

 

France launched their second National Action Plan (NAP) in 2015 for the period inclusive of 2015-2018.  The second NAP, external in focus, highlights initiatives created to advance the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda; introduces an additional strategic “pillar” ("fighting impunity") and expanded others (including that of "developing political and diplomatic action"). 

The foundation of the second French NAP remains the 2010 NAP, which lists four objectives: the protection of women, the participation of women in conflict and post-conflict situations, raising awareness of women’s rights and development of political and diplomatic action. 

France, in developing its third NAP, should turn its focus inward and focus on gathering disaggregated data surrounding its national achievement of its strategic objectives.

MethodologyThe grade is determined on the basis of a number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes that are emphasized in a 1325 National Action Plan (NAP). A NAP that emphasizes all WILPF/PeaceWomen themes receives 100%.
Resources

1. “National Action Plan: France,” PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed August 12, 2019.

0.0%
Balance between the 1325 National Action Plan (NAP) Budget and Military Expenditure.

CriteriaThe 1325 National Action Plan budget should increase overtime while military expenditure should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

The French National Action Plan does not include a WPS budget; therefore, France receives a score of 0%. France was among the top military spenders in 2018, at $63.8 billion in military expenditure.  

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), France was among the top five largest global suppliers of arms in 2018, who together supplied 75% of all arms exports. (France’s global share of the international arms exports is 6.8%.)

A  total of 44% of French arms exports went to the Middle East*, 29%  to Asia and Oceania, 9.5% to other states in Europe, 8.7% to the Americas and 8.5% to Africa. France delivered major arms to a total 78 states in 2014–18. (Egypt was the largest recipient of French arms during that period, followed by India.)

*French arms exports in the Middle East rose by 261% between 2009–13 and 2014–18.

Comment

In 2017, France’s military expenditure was $60.4 billion. 

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the NAP budget and military expenditure, etc.):

NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure decreases (90-100%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure does not change (79-89%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure decreases (68-78%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure does not change (57-67%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure decreases (46-56%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure increases (35-45%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure does not change (24-34%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure increases (13-23%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure increases (1-12%)
No NAP/No NAP Budget (0%)
Resources
  1. "SIPRI Military Expenditure by country," The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019.

  2. "Trends in World Military Expenditure," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019.

  3. "Trends in International Arms Transfers," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

  4. National Action Plan: France,” PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed August 12, 2019.

     

70.5%
Participation

80.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Parliament

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in Parliament.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Women made up 40% of the National Assembly (L'Assemblée nationale) in France in 2018. France fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men in its Lower House, therefore achieving a score of 80%.

Comment

 

The proportion of women in the Upper House, or the Senate (Sénat), was 32.2% in 2018.  

The 2018 figures represent a slight increase from 2017 (Lower: 39%; Upper: 29.3%). 

It is important to note that, though parity laws (which require gender quotas backed by significant financial penalties for non-compliance) implemented in 2000 have significantly boosted the statistics on paper -- France has come a long way from the 5.7% of women in parliament as of 1993-- women remain marginalized in the actual exercise of political power. That women politicians continue to confront pervasive stereotypes and contemptuous attitudes and are considered illegitimate by their male colleagues is well documented (though, in terms of hard data and attention from academia, under-researched).

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in Parliament, a state that ensures 50% of its parliamentarians are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female parliamentarians employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

  1. "Women in National Parliaments," Inter-Parliamentary Union. Accessed May 20 2019. 

  2. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [France, p. 101]. Accessed May 29 2019.

  3. "Women in French Politics: Rank and File More Often Than Leaders," Institute for Advanced Study, 2017. Accessed June 19, 2019. 

  4. "'Race' out, gender equality in as France updates constitution," France 24, 2018. Accessed June 19, 2019.

73.6%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Ministerial Positions

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in ministerial positions.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

52.9% of ministerial positions were held by women in France in 2018. France achieved equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men. 

Comment

N/A. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the ministerial positions, a state that ensures 50% of its ministers are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female ministers employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [France, p. 101], 2019. Accessed May 29 2019.

36.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Law Enforcement

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in law enforcement
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

18% of the positions in the French military police force (the Gendarmerie) were held by women in France in 2018. France fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men in its Lower House, therefore achieving a score of 36%.

Comment

 

The interior ministry in France is responsible for two national police forces: the Gendarmerie (the "military" police force) and the Police Nationale (the "civilian" police force).

In 2018, Women represented 20% of the national Gendarmerie (only 8% of officers were women).

According to the Interior Minister, in 2018, 3.23% (357 out of a total of 11,039) of the members of the general reserve (Compagnies républicaines de sécurité or CRS) of the French National Police were women.

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in law enforcement, a state that ensures 50% of its law enforcement agents are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female law enforcement agents employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

  1. "Quel est le pourcentage de femmes chez les CRS?," Libération, 2018. Accessed June 18, 2019. 

  2. "Police, justice: où sont les femmes?," L'Express, 2019. Accessed June 18, 2019.  

  3. "Chez les gendarmes, les femmes ont trouvé leur place," Vannes, 2019. Accessed June 18, 2019.

67.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Judiciary

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in the judiciary.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

66% of lower court judges in France were women in 2018. France achieved equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men in ministerial positions.

Comment

 

The French judiciary is categorized by two grades, the "premier grade" (lower ranking) the "second grade" (higher ranking), and the "hors-hiérarchie" (highest ranking).

In France, the higher one climbs the ladder within the judiciary, the fewer women one will find. Among the total 8,537 magistrates in 2018, 66% were women. 66% of "premier grade" judges and 77% of the "second grade" judges were women. However, only 46% of the most senior  ("hors-hiérarchie") positions were occupied by women.

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the judiciary, a state that ensures 50% of its judges are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female judges employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

1. "Journée des droits des femmes : la Chancellerie veut plus de mixité dans la magistrature," Dalloz Actualité, 2019. Accessed June 18, 2019.

67.6%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Labour Force

CriteriaWomen should have equal access to employment opportunities.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Women participate in the labour force at a rate of 67.6%, whereas men participate in the labour force at a rate of 75.5%.

Comment

N/A 

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) on the basis of its methodology.
Resources

  1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [France, p. 101], 2018. Accessed May 29 2019.
  2. French Government Paving the way to Gender Equality,” The National Law Review, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019.
  3. Act for the Freedom to Choose One’s Future Career,” The French Ministry of Labour, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019.

98.9%
Access to Education

CriteriaThere should be equal access to all levels of education.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Enrolment in primary education: 98.9%

Enrolment in secondary education: 94.5%

Enrolment in tertiary education: 71.5%

Comment

N/A 

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) and UNESCO, developed on the basis of their respective methodologies.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [France, p. 101], 2019. Accessed May 29 2019.

91.4%
Protection

100.0%
Presence of Gendered Perspective in Legal Framework

CriteriaGender should be mainstreamed throughout legal framework in accordance with the international law.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis Legal framework in France includes the following gender-sensitive laws and constitutional provisions in 2018:
Women and men are guaranteed the rights to vote, to hold public office, and to exercise public functions
Gender perspective incorporated into the constitution
Women and men are guaranteed the right to non-discrimination in education, employment and economic, and social activities
Women and men are guaranteed full equality in civil and business matters
Women and men are guaranteed equal rights and obligations with regard to choice of spouse, parenthood, personal rights, and command over property
Women and men are guaranteed reproductive rights
Women and men are guaranteed equal pay for equal work
Women and men are guaranteed the right to live lives free from violence
Gender sensitive laws and constitutional previsions
Comment

In France, women were granted the right to vote in 1944, casting their first ballot in 1945. The role of women in French politics has grown slowly. (By 1993, only 5.7% of seats in France’s Parliament were occupied by women.)  The lack of women in politics prompted France to revise their constitution in 1999 to mandate gender-quotas in elected political bodies and to pass "parity laws" (which require all political parties to include equal numbers of men and women on party lists) in 2000. France revised its constitution again in 2008, to extend the parity clause to ‘social and professional responsibilities,’ thus enabling the adoption of a law imposing gender quotas on corporate boards in 2011. France has focused on extending parity through intersectoral legislation (including the implementation of new laws concerning parity and gender equality in 2012 and 2014 respectively) surrounding the establishment of gender quotas (and imposition of financial penalties for non-compliance). 

The Preamble to the Constitution of 1946 that prohibits discrimination with regard to the criteria of sex, race, belief and trade union activity, and of the current Constitution dated 1958 that contains a provision according to which “the nation ensures equality before the law of all citizens, whatever their ethnic origin, race or religion” (article 2 of the French Constitution). However, in 2018, French MPs removed the word "race" from the constitution and added a ban on gender discrimination as part of a rewrite.

Regarding sexual harassment laws, in France, there is no legal age of consent for sex. This means that, where a minor is a victim of sexual harassment or violence, there is no legal presumption of coercion. This leads to arguments in French court rooms such as those put forth in a recent sexual assault case, where attorneys for the perpetrator of the assault stated that the victim “was 11 years and 10 months old, so nearly 12 years old. It changes the story... So she is not a child," emphasizing that "we are not dealing with a sexual predator on a poor little faultless goose.”

Methodology8 - 100%
7 - 87.5%
6 - 75%
5 - 62.5%
4 - 50%
3 - 37.5%
2 - 25%
1 - 12.5%
0 - 0%

Necessary legal framework is determined in accordance with the principles of the core human rights treaties (i.e.: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)).
Resources

  1. "The Policy on Gender Equality in France," European Parliament DIrectorate-General for Internal Policies (FEMM Committee), 2015. Accessed June 19, 2019. 

  2. "France marks 70 years of women's rights," France 24, 2014. Accessed June 19, 2019. 

  3. "'Race' out, gender equality in as France updates constitution," France 24, 2018. Accessed June 19, 2019. 

  4. "Chronologie : Les droits des femmes," La Direction de l'information légale et administrative (DILA), 2018. Accessed June 20, 2019.

85.7%
Access to Justice

CriteriaWomen's unrestricted access to justice exists.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis The following protections are guaranteed by France in 2018:
Equal access to formal legal dispute systems and the right to legal representation
Non-discrimination law
Existence of courts and judicial bodies
Financial affordability of access to legal proceedings and/or legal aid
Free access to an interpreter during legal proceedings
Victim protection
Existence of gender units within justice institutions
Comment

 

A brief note on applied standards: WILPF's analysis of the above indicators is performed with attention to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women's general recommendation on women’s access to justice (CEDAW/C/GC/33). 

Though it is clear that, in 2018, women in France enjoy equal access to legal dispute systems and legal representation, the practicability of these rights is significantly less clear. Our ability to assess this indicator is limited by the dearth of data on the subject - a gap that must be rectified. 

The existence of non-discrimination laws is similarly well-documented, particularly in statistics that demonstrate increases in numbers of women largely resulting from the application of gender quotas implemented as a result of the parity laws (as, for example, those that demonstrate a pronounced increase in women in - for example - the political arena). However, it is critical to underline that ensuring the meaningful participation of women remains problematic. 

Courts and judicial bodies do exist in France, though their nebulous nature has been critiqued time and again (and has, at times, served as a hindrance for justice-seekers). 

In France, the Défenseur des Droits (an independent administrative body) works to ensure that targets of discrimination have meaningful access to justice (for example, by providing them with information, legal aid and, where applicable, mediation services, helping them to gather evidence of discriminatory acts, and awareness-raising).

France provides free access to all legal proceedings. France also provides protection and aid to victims in several forms (through the publication of guides, conduct of trainings for those who work with victims, the establishment of hotlines and points of contact, etc.) 

French courts have confirmed that people have all who come before it must be granted access to sign language interpreters. Where victims reporting crimes require interpreters, they will be provided with one.

MethodologyThe necessary protections represent the CEDAW standard on women's access to justice.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%"
Resources

 

  1. "General recommendations on women’s access to justice," Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women [CEDAW/C/GC/33], 2015. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  2. "Garantir aux femmes l’égalité d’accès à la justice," The European Council, 2016. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  3. "L’égalité et la non-discrimination dans l’accès à la justice," Parliamentary Assembly (The European Council). Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  4. "The Policy on Gender Equality in France," European Parliament DIrectorate-General for Internal Policies (FEMM Committee), 2015. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  5. Avis pour une juste condamnation sociétale et judiciaire du viol et autres agressions sexuelles,” Haut Conseil à l’Egalité entre les femmes et les hommes, 2016. Accessed June 20, 2019.

100.0%
Protections Against Human Trafficking

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance in 2018 is in:
Complete compliance with the minimum standards
Partial compliance with the minimum standards
Non-compliance with the minimum standards
Comment

 

A brief note on applied standards: Our minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons reflect those outlined in the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons Especially Women and Children, and the United States' State Department's annual Trafficking in Persons reports (the primary source employed in our evaluation).  For more detailed discussions concerning these standards, check out our resources below.

According to the United States’ State Department’s Trafficking in Persons Report, France is “fully compliant with the minimum standards” for the elimination of trafficking in persons: France increased international assistance and capacity building to prevent trafficking and adopted a new law requiring large companies to create plans to prevent labor exploitation by sub-contractors. However, there were areas in need of improvement. The French Government remains without comprehensive data on trafficking and quality control across shelters remains difficult. Some survivors were arrested and prosecuted without the appropriate screening for trafficking indicators. (Data concerning exact numbers of prosecutions and sentencings either has not been collected or is publicly unavailable.)

MethodologyAdherence is measured in accordance with the “Palermo Protocols” and grading system developed by the US state Department’s annual report on trafficking in persons.
Full compliance: 100%
Partial Compliance: 50%
Non-Compliance: 0%

Resources

  1. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report," The United States Department of State, 2018 [Methodology at pps. 38- 45; France at pps. 189-191]. Accessed June 4, 2019. [Full report]
  2. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report: France," The United States Department of State, 2018. Accessed June 4, 2019. [France only]

**Researcher's Note: the 2018 Trafficking in Persons Report covers government efforts to combat human trafficking undertaken from April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. Reports are typically released in June.

80.0%
Protections Against Sexual Violence.

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of sexual violence.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance in 2018 has the following services in place:
Existence of a law against sexual violence
Governmental efforts to eliminate sexual violence nationally
Existence of a national crisis hotline
Existence of women's shelters
Existence of women's rape crisis centres
Comment

In 2018, France increased funding to its national helpline (3919) for women suffering from domestic violence.

The Institut National d’Aide aux Victimes et de Médiation offers a national helpline that is accessible from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM every day, which serves to guide victims and loved ones (particularly on some aspects of the judicial process). The Collectif Feministe Contre Le Viol provides a confidential answering service from 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM every day, which offers listening, support (especially in terms of guidance surrounding services and access to specialist help), and solidarity to victims. On top of the TV campaign, which is part of the new measures, the government plans to increase funding and staff for the national helpline (3919) for women suffering from domestic violence.

In 1997, France established an emergency number ("1-1-5", answered 24/7) for those seeking accommodation. Primarily employed as a pillar in France's efforts to combat homelessness, this number is also used by those fleeing domestic violence. Initially, accommodation was provided "on the door." However, with the 2010 establishment of the Integrated Accomodation and Advice Services (SAIO), all callers who seek housing must be assessed by a social worker (who must then make a recommendation). The "gross inadequacy" of "accomodation stock" across France remains highly problematic.   

In 2018, filings of complaints alleging rape increased by 17 percent while sexual assault complaints increased by nearly 20 percent. The interior ministry emphasized the possible role of an increased "collective awareness of violence towards women born out of the [Harvey] Weinstein affair... and the MeToo movement," and the possibility that "...the higher number of victims... probably comes from increased reporting of such crimes and a reduction in tolerance for this type of violence."

Rape crisis centres do not exist in France. 

The legal definition of rape (viol) in France is: “any act of sexual penetration, whatever the type, upon a third party, through violence, threats or surprise”. Sexual assault (agression sexuelle) is defined as: “any sexual infringement carried out using violence, coercion, threats or surprise”.

Human Rights Watch*:

"In August, France adopted a new sexual violence law aimed at tackling sexual harassment and sexual violence against children. The law makes street harassment an offense, raises the statute of limitation on sex crimes against children from 20 to 30 years, and gives judges the power to rule on a case by case basis that sex by an adult with a child under 15 is rape but falls short of criminalizing all such sex with a child under 15 as rape. In September, a man was convicted of street harassment (“outrage sexiste”) for the first time under the new law and fined 300 euros (approximately $340)."

MethodologyThe standard is derived from the CEDAW and Istanbul Convention.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources

  1. "France: Law on Violence Against Women," Library of Congress, 2010. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  2. "Les associations près de chez vous," Office of the Secretary of Equality, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  3. "Le service intégré de l'accueil et de l'orientation (siao)," Le services de l'Etat dans le Finistère, 2017. Accessed June 20, 2019.  

  4. "Qui sommes nous?," Collectif Féministe Contre Le Viol, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  5. "Que faire?" Solidarité Femmes, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

90.8%
Recovery Support

80.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes Serving the Needs of Veterans

CriteriaDedicated programmes for female veterans should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance in 2018 provides the following services:
Female veterans affairs offices exist in urban and rural areas
Economic benefits (i.e. disability, housing) exist
Health service benefits (i.e. free veterans health insurance, gender-sensitive PTSD care) exist
Educational benefits exist
Employment services exist
Comment

The French National Office for Veterans and Victims of War (ONACVG) operates in furtherance of three primary objectives: solidarity, recognition and reparation, and remembrance. Much of its social action and service provision falls under the umbrella of its solidarity mission (which manages a budget of €27 million).

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the international concept of the responsibility to protect. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%

Resources
  1. "Accompagnement pour une reconversion personnelle," L'Office national des anciennes combattantes et victimes de guerre, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  2. "Vacances de Poste," Ministère de l'Éducation nationale et de la Jeunesse, [no "last update" date indicated]. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  3. "Solidarité," L'Office national des anciennes combattantes et victimes de guerre, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  4. "Rapport d'information,"  L'Office national des anciennes combattantes et victimes de guerre, 2016. Accessed June 20, 2019. a

83.3%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Sexual Violence

CriteriaDedicated programmes for survivors of sexual violence should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance in 2018 provides the following services:
National crisis hotline
Women's shelters
Women's rape crisis centres
Counseling services
National sex-offender list or website
Support groups for victims/survivors
Comment

 

The National Federation of Solidarity for Women (FNSF) is a network of organisations that provide guidance and shelter for women victims of abuse with an anonymous and free-of-charge hotline. Due to the decentralized nature of the services of women’s centres and shelters, there is limited information available surrounding them. 

France established its offender registration law in 2004, which went into full force in 2005 and is retroactively applicable (though there is no public disclosure of any kind for any registration information).

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the CEDAW, Istanbul Convention and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
6 - 100%
5 - 83%
4 - 66%
3 - 49%
2 - 32%
1 - 15%
0 - 0%.
Resources

  1. Rape Crisis Network Europe: France,” Rape Crisis Network Europe, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019.

  2. "Les associations près de chez vous," Office of the Secretary of Equality, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  3. "Access to Shelter in France," La Fédération des acteurs de la solidarité, 2018. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

  4. "Le service intégré de l'accueil et de l'orientation (siao)," Le services de l'Etat dans le Finistère, 2017. Accessed June 20, 2019.  

  5. "Qui sommes nous?," Collectif Féministe Contre Le Viol, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019. 

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Human Trafficking

CriteriaDedicated programmes for urvivors of human trafficking should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance in 2018 provides the following services:
Human trafficking hotline
Human trafficking shelter
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.)
Health services
Legal services
Job training programmes
Educational services
Comment

 

From the 2018 Trafficking in Persons Report: 

“The French government maintained its recovery support efforts.  The Ministry of Solidarity and Health, and the City of Paris provided funding for the AcSe system, an NGO-managed network of 45 NGO-run shelters and 23 specialized NGOs assisting adult victims of sex and labor trafficking. AcSe assisted 79 trafficking victims in 2017, compared with 82 in 2016, providing them shelter, legal, medical, and psychological services. Seventy-four were victims of sex trafficking, one of labor trafficking, and three were forced to commit a petty crime. The government maintained Ac-Se’s budget at €220,000 ($264,110) for 2018.

Local governments provided French language classes to victims, and some victims could qualify for subsidized housing and job training programs. The government, through the national employment agency, provided some foreign victims a stipend of €340 ($410) a month; civil society reported the conditions for being granted a stipend were not uniform and varied by region. The central and municipal governments also partially funded the operation of a shelter in Paris and a small number of emergency apartments external to the Ac-Se system. Child trafficking victims were referred to the child welfare services (ASE) system. GRETA reported the existing ASE shelters varied in quality of care and many were not suited for the special assistance needs of child trafficking victims. During the reporting period, six child trafficking victims received services from ASE shelters. 

The government continued to operate a hotline for children in abusive situations, including trafficking. In 2017, hotline operators received 1,550 calls related to trafficking. AcSe, with assistance from 60 partner organisations, operated a separate hotline during the reporting period. The hotline received more than 900 calls and on average referred 50 trafficking cases a year to Ac-Se for assistance. The government had an NGO-run referral program to transfer victims detained, arrested, or placed in protective custody by law enforcement authorities to institutions that provided short-term care. Criminal trials for trafficking or aggravated pimping could be heard in private at the victim’s request. Victims could receive a 30-day reflection period during which they could decide whether to lodge a complaint or participate in criminal proceedings against a trafficker; however, some authorities were not familiar with the reflection period and did not offer it. Victims were eligible for temporary residence permits, regardless of whether they cooperated with police investigations. Trafficking victims were also eligible for international protection under refugee status or subsidiary protection status in cases where victims had a credible fear of retaliation, including from public authorities in their country of origin, if returned. Victims were eligible to receive restitution through the Crime Victims Compensation Program. The compensation request process often took several years to complete, and many victims had requests in progress.”

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with Palermo Protocol and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources

  1. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report," The United States Department of State, 2018 [Methodology at pps. 38- 45; France at pps. 189-191]. Accessed June 4, 2019. [Full report]

  2. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report: France," The United States Department of State, 2018. Accessed June 4, 2019. [France only]

**Researcher's Note: the 2018 Trafficking in Persons Report covers government efforts to combat human trafficking undertaken from April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. Reports are typically released in June.

100.0%
Implementation Dedicated Programmes to Support Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)

CriteriaDedicated programmes for refugees, asylum seekers, and IDPs should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisFrance in 2018 provides the following services:
State refugee/IDP strategy exists
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.) are provided
Health services are available
Legal services are available
Job training programmes are available
Educational services are available
Community engagement/integration programmes are available
Comment

 

From Human Rights Watch*:

"In August, France adopted a flawed asylum and immigration law. The French Ombudsman, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and NGOs criticized the law for undermining access to asylum, including by weakening appeal rights and safeguards for those subject to accelerated asylum procedures. The law failed to ban detention of migrant children, despite six European Court of Human Rights rulings that such detention by France violated their rights. 

In April and May, the French ombudsman warned of the dire living conditions of migrants and asylum seekers in the camp of La Villette, in Paris, and in Grande-Synthe in northern France, and called for the camps’ dismantlement only if sustainable solutions respectful of fundamental rights are implemented. Authorities cleared the camps in late May and early September respectively. Living conditions for migrants and asylum seekers in the Calais area remain squalid and harassment of aid workers there by police continued.

Child protection authorities in Paris continued to use flawed age assessment procedures for unaccompanied migrant children, excluding many from care they need and are entitled to, leaving hundreds homeless.

In July, the Constitutional Council ruled that solidarity was among the highest values of the French republic and that assisting undocumented migrants should not therefore be criminalized “when these acts are carried out for humanitarian purposes.” This ruling was enshrined in the August immigration and asylum law. NGOs remain concerned that judges could narrowly interpret the humanitarian exception in a way that permits prosecutions.

Since late 2017, France’s asylum office selected 458 refugees currently in camps in Niger and Chad for resettlement. France pledged to resettle 3,000 refugees from that region before October 2019."

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) recommendations. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources

  1. "France: Police harassing, intimidating and even using violence against people helping refugees," Amnesty International, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2019.