Scorecard of United Kingdom 2018-01-01 00:00:00

United Kingdom 2018
74.3

International Actions

80.0%
Security Council Actions

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in All Security Council Open Debates

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 16 out of 16 Open Debates in 2018 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security:  4/16

Conflict Prevention:  2/16

Disarmament:  2/16

Displacement and Humanitarian Response:  3/16

Participation: 7/16

Peace Processes: 5/16

Peacekeeping: 4/16

Protection: 3/16

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 2/16

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 4/16

Implementation: 3/16

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 6/16

Human Rights: 5/16

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of all Security Council open debates per year.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

n/a
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Threats Caused by Terrorist Acts

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisInformation is currently not available.
Comment

N/A. 

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the threats caused by terrorist acts.
Resources

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Maintenance of International Peace and Security

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 4 out of 4 Open Debates on the maintenance of international peace and security in 2018 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 2/4

Conflict Prevention:1/4

Disarmament: 0/4

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 0/4

Participation: 3/4

Peace Processes: 1/4

Peacekeeping: 0/4

Protection: 0/4

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/4

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 0/4

Implementation: 1/4

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 2/4

Human Rights: 2/4

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the maintenance of international peace and security.
Resources

 

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

100.0%
Inclusion of WPS-sensitive Language in the Security Council Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians

Criteria100% of the statements made by a state during the Security Council thematic open debates should include WPS-sensitive language.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom had 1 out of 1 Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians in 2018 where it made statements related to Women, Peace and Security.
Comment

WILPF/PeaceWomen themes covered:

General Women, Peace and Security: 0/1

Conflict Prevention: 0/1

Disarmament: 0/1

Displacement and Humanitarian Response: 1/1

Participation: 1/1

Peace Processes: 0/1

Peacekeeping: 1/1

Protection: 1/1

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding: 0/1

Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: 1/1

Implementation: 0/1

Justice, Rule of Law, SSR: 1/1

Human Rights: 1/1

MethodologyThe number of debates in which a state has used WPS-sensitive language at least once out of a total number of Security Council open debates on the protection of civilians.
Resources

 

1. Meeting Records Archive, United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

100.0%
The Use of Veto

CriteriaA state should not apply its veto right.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

N/A.

Methodology100% - No veto right was used;
75% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
50% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (no gender-sensitive language);
25% - A state uses its veto right in less than (or equals to) 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language);
0% - A state uses its veto right in more than 50% of vetoed draft resolutions (with gender-sensitive language).
Resources

1. Veto List, The United Nations Security Council, 2018. Accessed May 29 2019. 

0.0%
Commitments Intended to Strengthen the Implementation of the WPS Agenda

CriteriaAll WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered in the WPS commitments.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisIn its statements made at the 2018 Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security, the United Kingdom covered the following WILPF/PeaceWomen themes:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

Though the United Kingdom did not identify any new commitments in 2018, it did offer updates on previous years' commitments: 

Peace Processes: The United Kingdom brought members of the Women Mediators across the Commonwealth network to New York in October to exchange experiences with other regional networks of women mediators and to explore ways to collectively drive the agenda forward.

Implementation: The United Kingdom has a cross-Government national action plan committed to increasing women’s participation in decision-making and to scaling up initiatives to prevent and to respond to gender-based violence.

Participation: The United Kingdom has opened all military roles to women and is close to meeting the target of women making up 15 per cent of armed forces.

MethodologyThe number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes emphasised in a statement identifies the final percentage received by a state
Resources

1. Call to Action on 2015 Commitments [homepage, where commitments for years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 are located], WILPF, 2015. Accessed May 29 2019. 

2. UNSC WPS Debate Commitments 2018 [PDF of WILPF analysis], WILPF, 2018. Accessed May 29 2019. 

53.0%
Women, Peace and Security Financing

53.0%
Balance Between UN Women Total Contribution and Arms Sales Revenue

CriteriaTotal contribution to UN Women should increase overtime while Arms Sales Revenue should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

UN Women Contribution decreased; Arms Transfer Revenue decreased.

The UK is ranked 7th on the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's list of global military spenders.

Arms Transfer Revenue, Total Contribution in 2018: $ 533,000,000  

UN Women Government Total Contribution in 2018:  $15,940,000 

Military Expenditure in 2018:  $ 50,000,000,000

 

Comment

Arms Transfer Revenue in 2017: $ 952,000,000

UN Women Government Total Contribution in 2017: $ 16,490,000

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the arms transfer revenue and the UN Women contribution, etc.):
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (90-100%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (79-89%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (68-78%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (57-67%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue decreases (46-56%);
UN Women Contribution increases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (35-45%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue does not change (24-34%);
UN Women Contribution does not change; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (13-23%);
UN Women Contribution decreases; Arms Transfer Revenue increases (0-12%).
Resources
  1. "Core Resources: Top 25 Donors 2018," UN Women, 2018. Accessed May 21, 2019. 
  2. "Arms Transfers and Military Spending," Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 
  3. "Importer/Exporter TIV Tables," SIPRI. Accessed May 21, 2019. 
  4. "Trends in World Military Expenditure," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 
  5. "Trends in International Arms Transfers," SIPRI, 2019. Accessed May 21, 2019. 

 

85.0%
International Gender and Human Rights Indicators

87.2%
Ranking via Gender Inequality Index (GII)

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Inequality Index (GII).
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom was ranked 25 among 189 participating countries in 2018.
Comment

In 2017, the United Kingdom was ranked 25 of 189 countries. 

Researcher's note: The 2019 Human Development Report will not be released until November 2019, as it is being significantly re-envisioned in order to "go beyond the dominant discourse focused on income disparities."

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

1. "Human Development Reports: Table 5: Gender Inequality Index," The United Nations Development Programme, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2019. 

90.5%
Ranking via Global Gender Gap Index

CriteriaA state should be ranked first in the Gender Gap Index.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom was ranked 15 among 149 participating countries in 2018.
Comment

N/A 

Methodology100% is received by a state that is ranked 1st; 0% is received by a state that is ranked last.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [United Kingdom, p. 285], 2019. Accessed May 29 2019.

77.3%
Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties

CriteriaA state ratifies all international human rights gender-sensitive treaties.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom has signed and possibly ratified the following International Human Rights Treaties in 2018:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - signed
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - signed
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - ratified
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - signed
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - ratified
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - signed
Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages - ratified
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - signed
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women - ratified
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - signed
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - ratified
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - signed
Protocol to Prevent, Supress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, to The Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime - ratified
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - signed
Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others - ratified
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - signed
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War - ratified
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - signed
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) - ratified
Arms Trade Treaty - signed
Arms Trade Treaty - ratified
Comment

N/A. 

Methodology100% is received by a state that has signed and ratified all International Human Rights Treaties. Ratification of a treaty provides a state with a full point; a signature (without ratification) provides a state with half of a point.
11 - 99-100%;
10 - 90%;
9 - 81%;
8 - 72%;
7 - 63%;
6 - 54%;
5 - 45%;
4 - 36%;
3 - 27%;
2 - 18%;
1 - 9%;
0 - 0%
Resources

1.     Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "The Yearbook of the United Nations, 1948-1949: Part I, Section V.: Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Questions," pp. 529-530, The United Nations Department of Public Information, 1950. Accessed May 30, 2019. 

2.     International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1976; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1976; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: 1981; Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: 2000: "Status of Ratification: Interactive Dashboard," United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 2014. Accessed May 30, 2019. 

3.     "Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 

4.     "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed 30 May 2019. 

5.     "Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others," The United Nations Treaty Collection, 2019. Accessed May 30, 2019. 

6.     "Geneva Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war," The United Nations, 2019. Accessed May 30, 2019. 

7.     Additional Protocol II: "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977," International Committee of the Red Cross, 2019. Accessed May 30, 2019. 

8.     Arms Trade Treaty: "Arms Trade Treaty," United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, 2019. Accessed May 30, 2019.

56.2%
Peacekeeping Operations

12.3%
Contribution of Troops, Police and Military Experts

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in peacekeeping.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom provided 43 women out of 699 peacekeepers in 2018.
Comment

Contingent Troops: 627 men, 39 women, 666 total. 

Experts on Mission: 4 men, 0 women, 4 total. 

Staff Officers: 25 men, 4 women, 29 total. 

Total, peacekeepers provided: 656 men, 43 women, 699 total. 

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in peacekeeping, a state that ensures 50% of its personnel are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a score that depends on the percentage of female personnel contributed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Data is provided by the United Nations (Department of Peacekeeping Operations).
Resources
  1. "Contributors to UN Peacekeeping Operations by Country and Post," United Nations Peacekeeping, 2019. Accessed May 28, 2019. 
  2. "Summary of Contributions to Peackeeping by Mission, Country and Post," United Nations Peacekeeping, 2019. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

 

100.0%
Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) Allegedly Committed by Peacekeepers

CriteriaThere should be a "zero tolerance" policy with respect to sexual exploitation and abuse.
Note*: Information on SEA is gathered based on publicly available information. Official statistics are available starting from 2015.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Peacekeepers from the United Kingdom did not commit any of the 54 alleged sexual abuse and exploitation incidents in 2018. 

Comment

N/A. 

MethodologyIn line with the UN "zero tolerance" policy, at least one allegation of sexual abuse provides a state with 0%.
states that have not been involved in the SEA allegations receives 100%.
Resources
  1. "Conduct in UN Field Missions: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse: Allegations," The United Nations, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. [To obtain total # of allegations.]
  2. "Conduct in UN Field Missions: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse: Alleged Perpetrators," The United Nations, 2018. Access May 28, 2019. [To obtain total # of perpetrators.]

 

National Actions

56.2%
Prevention

80.0%
Partnership Between Womens Civil Society Organisations and the Government

CriteriaThere should be a funded and governmentally-supported women's civil society landscape.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

 

Our analysis of states' support is founded on our analysis of governments' public remarks surrounding, commitments, partnerships with and actions taken to advance the position of civil society, as reported by the civil society, reputable media outlets and the governments themselves. We found that, in 2018, the UK engaged in joint government/NGO efforts and allocated funding to civil society, thus meeting the minimum standards for receipt of a top-tier grade. 

However, the UK receives 80% - the lowest possible mark within the top tier - because: Even though the government is engaged in collabouration with women's civil society and provides financial support to women's organisations, the number of projects on the WPS Agenda in existence is low, and mass-surveillance in accordance with national security and anti-terrorisim efforts restrict civil society freedoms (i.e.: freedom of the press, freedom of public association).

Comment

 

Funding. The UK CSOs receive the second largest proportion of EU aid (both grant and service (commercial) contracts combined). In 2017 (the most recent year for which data is available), civil society organisations had an estimated combined annual income of £197.8bn. As of September 2018, there were 168,186 officially registered charities in the United Kingdom.

Spotlight: Grassroots. To better understand the nature and extent of partnership between women-led civil society and the government, WILPF performs a more in-depth analysis of the actions, efforts and impact of each nation's leading women's organisation(s). For our study of the UK, WILPF examined the Women's Resource Centre (WRC).

The WRC is a membership organisation that functions as the umbrella body for women's charities, with over 500 members. WRC works to support member women NGOs to be more effective and sustainable through the provision of training, information, resources and one-to-one support on a range of organisational development issues while also lobbying decision makers on behalf of the women’s not-for-profit sector for improved representation and funding. 

Types of social support provided by the WRC include: education, anti-violence, women's empowerment, gender-related training, political participation, anti-human trafficking, women's health, lobbying and policymaking and fundraising. 

 

MethodologyWhen there is both financial support from the government and active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 80% to 100% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is either only financial support from the government or only active collabouration between the government and civil society, a state receives from 60% to 79% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and where there are no restrictions applied on womens organisation, a state receives from 40% to 59% depending on circumstances (i.e.: kinds of services provided by civil society, etc.);

When there is neither both financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when government provides services for women, a state receives from 20% to 39% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.);

When there is neither financial support from the government nor active collabouration between the government and civil society and when there are several restrictions on civil society, a state receives from 0% to 19% depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative assessment; decrease/increase in the number of projects, etc.).
Resources
  1. "Our Work," Women's Resource Centre, 2014. Accessed May 14, 2019.
  2. “The impact of Brexit on EU funding for CSOs”, Bond, July 2017. Accessed May 14, 2019. 
  3. "Recent Charity Register Statistics: Charity Commission," Charity Commission for England and Wales, 2018. Accessed May 14, 2019.

 

60.0%
Special Gender-Specific Training of Security and Law Enforcement Personnel

CriteriaSpecial gender-specific training for law enforcement and security sector should exist.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom implemented the following training standards in 2018:
Assessment of gender-sensitive training is present
Overall training objective is gender sensitive
Gender parity among trainers and trainees
Women's organisations or gender-related societal leaders are engaged to provide contextual perspective on gender within the security sector
Follow-up communication and gender-related knowledge dissemination methods are established
Comment

In 2018, there were official strategies at the local and national levels to implement gender-specific training of security and law enforcement. Accountability and responsibility for the implementation of these strategies was clearly outlined. However, due to inadequate resources and the perception of the “diversity agenda” as a low priority within the UK police force (among other issues), these strategies often lacked meaningful impact and largely fell short of bringing about the change the UK police force badly needs. Diversity within the UK police force has been described as “patchy,” with public outrage surrounding the absence of diversity (particularly in decision-making roles) prompting the House of Commons and House Affairs Committee to conduct a formal inquiry in 2016 (followed by the Government’s formal reply).

MethodologyThe criteria is determined in line with the UN Women guidelines (developed in partnership with the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) and the European Union).
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources
  1. “United Kingdom Case Studies: Gender & Security Sector Reform, Examples from the Ground”, DCAF ISSAT, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019.  

  1. “Assessing UK Government Action on Women, Peace and Security in 2018”, GAPS UK, January 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  1. Enhancing Diversity in Policing: Final Report,” NatCen, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019.  

  2. The National Police Chiefs’ Council Diversity, Equality and Inclusion Strategy: 2018-2025,” The National Police Chiefs’ Council and Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019.  

84.6%
National Action Plan on the Implementation of UNSC Resolution 1325 bases on WPS Themes

CriteriaA state has implemented a 1325 National Action Plan. All WILPF/PeaceWomen themes should be covered.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom implements UNSC Resolution 1325 and covers following Peacewomen Themes 2018:
General Women, Peace and Security
Conflict Prevention
Disarmament
Participation
Peace Processes
Protection
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
Peacekeeping
Displacement and Humanitarian Response
Human Rights
Justice, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform
Reconstruction and Peacebuilding
Implementation
Comment

Timeframe. UK's NAP is for the period 2018-2022, but does not provide specific timeframes for the outcomes it describes.

NAP Budget. There is no estimated or allocated budget in the 2018-2022 NAP. In explaining this decision, the UK stated that it found "...little evidence that a ring fenced funding pool would significantly improve the UK’s delivery of WPS initiatives compared to other measures such as ensuring that WPS is strategically and meaningful mainstreamed throughout programming.” In accordance with this view, the UK Government departments fund work on WPS from their core budgets, such as the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s Global Britain Fund, and cross-government funds including the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund.

MethodologyThe grade is determined on the basis of a number of WILPF/PeaceWomen themes that are emphasized in a 1325 National Action Plan (NAP). A NAP that emphasizes all WILPF/PeaceWomen themes receives 100%.
Resources

  1. “National Action Plan: UK”, PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  2. “UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace & Security 2018 - 2022”, HM Government, January 2018. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  3. "UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace & Security 2018 - 2022: Annual Report to Parliament 2018," HM Government, December 2018. Accessed June 10, 2019.

0.0%
Balance between the 1325 National Action Plan (NAP) Budget and Military Expenditure.

CriteriaThe 1325 National Action Plan budget should increase overtime while military expenditure should decrease overtime.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

As the United Kingdom’s fourth National Action Plan (released in 2018) does not include a WPS budget, the United Kingdom receieves a 0%.  

In 2018, the United Kingdom’s military expenditures were approximately $50 billion ($49,997,000,000). The United Kingdom was among the top military spenders of 2018. 

Comment

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s military expenditure was $46,433,000,000. The United Kingdom’s previous National Action Plan did not include a WPS budget.

MethodologyA grade varies depending on circumstances (i.e.: positive/negative consistency in spendings, ratio between the NAP budget and military expenditure, etc.):

NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure decreases (90-100%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure does not change (79-89%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure decreases (68-78%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure does not change (57-67%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure decreases (46-56%)
NAP Budget increases; Military Expenditure increases (35-45%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure does not change (24-34%)
NAP Budget does not change; Military Expenditure increases (13-23%)
NAP Budget decreases; Military Expenditure increases (1-12%)
No NAP/No NAP Budget (0%)
Resources
  1. "SIPRI Military Expenditure by country," The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

  1. Military Expenditure,” SIPRI, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2019. 

  1. National Action Plan: United Kingdom,” PeaceWomen, 2019. Accessed May 28, 2019.  

  1. Briefing Paper: UK Defence Expenditure,” The House of Commons Library, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019.   

69.3%
Participation

64.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Parliament

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in Parliament.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Women made up 32% of the House of Commons (the Lower House) in the United Kingdom in 2018.  The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men in its Lower House, therefore achieving a score of 64%. 

Comment

In 2018, the United Kingdom's Upper House (the House of Lords) was 26.4%

The proportion of women in the House of Commons remained stagnant, comprised of 32% women. The proportion of women increased slightly in the House of Lords, from 25.7% in 2017.

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in Parliament, a state that ensures 50% of its parliamentarians are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female parliamentarians employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

  1. “Women in National Parliaments,” Inter Parliamentary Union, Accessed May 20, 2019. 

  2. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [United Kingdom, p. 285], 2018. Accessed May 29, 2019.

62.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Ministerial Positions

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in ministerial positions.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

31% of ministerial positions were held by women in the United Kingdom in 2018. The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men, therefore achieving a score of 62%. 

Comment

N/A

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the ministerial positions, a state that ensures 50% of its ministers are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female ministers employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [United Kingdom, p. 285], 2018. Accessed May 29 2019.

60.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in Law Enforcement

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in law enforcement
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

30% of law enforcement positions were held by women in the United Kingdom in 2018. The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men, therefore achieving a score of 60%.

Comment

There were 36,417 women police officers in the 43 police forces on 31 March 2018, making up 30% of police officers in England and Wales (the highest proportion on record). The number of women officers increased by 573 (2%) compared with a year earlier, and the proportion of police officers who are women increased (up 0.6 percentage points from 29.1% on 31 March 2017).

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in law enforcement, a state that ensures 50% of its law enforcement agents are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female law enforcement agents employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

  1. "Statistical Bulletin: Police Workforce: England and Wales," The Home Office, Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2018 [p. 33]. Accessed June 10, 2019.

  2. Police Workforce,” Her Majesty’s Government, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019. 

  3. Enhancing Diversity in Policing: Final Report,” NatCen, 2018. Accessed August 12, 2019.

58.0%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Judiciary

CriteriaThere should be equal participation of women and men in the judiciary.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

29% of judges in the United Kingdom were women in 2018. The United Kingdom fell short of equal participation (50% - 50%) of women and men, therefore achieving a score of 58%.

Comment

 

29% of court judges and 46% of tribunal judges were women, representing a 1% increase for each category in 2017. 

Notably, younger age groups had higher levels of women's representation. Over half of court judges under 40 were women (55%), and almost half (47%) of court judges aged 40-49 were women. Notably, tribunal judges had greater representation of women judges than male judges at all age groups except those aged 60 or over, of whom just over a third (34%) were women.

MethodologyConsidering that there should be equal participation of men and women in the judiciary, a state that ensures 50% of its judges are females receives 100%. Otherwise, a state earns a grade that depends on the percentage of female judges employed by a state on the basis of the expected ratio.
Resources

  1. “Judicial Diversity Statistics 2018”, Ministry of Justice, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  2. “2018 must be the year that we reimagine judicial diversity”, The Conversation, 2018. Accessed May 14, 2019.

72.2%
Percentage of Women's Participation in the Labour Force

CriteriaWomen should have equal access to employment opportunities.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

72.2% of women participate in the labour force, compared to 82.4% of men. 

Comment

N/A 

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) on the basis of its methodology.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [United Kingdom, p. 285], 2018. Accessed May 29 2019.

99.7%
Access to Education

CriteriaThere should be equal access to all levels of education.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis

Enrolment in primary education: 99.7% 

Enrolment in secondary education: 98.0%

Enrolment in tertiary education: 68.5%

Comment

N/A

MethodologyData collected from the Gender Gap Index (GGI) and UNESCO, developed on the basis of their respective methodologies.
Resources

1. "The Global Gender Gap Report: 2018," The World Economic Forum [United Kingdom, p. 285], 2018. Accessed May 29 2019.

100.0%
Protection

100.0%
Presence of Gendered Perspective in Legal Framework

CriteriaGender should be mainstreamed throughout legal framework in accordance with the international law.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis Legal framework in the United Kingdom includes the following gender-sensitive laws and constitutional provisions in 2018:
Women and men are guaranteed the rights to vote, to hold public office, and to exercise public functions
Gender perspective incorporated into the constitution
Women and men are guaranteed the right to non-discrimination in education, employment and economic, and social activities
Women and men are guaranteed full equality in civil and business matters
Women and men are guaranteed equal rights and obligations with regard to choice of spouse, parenthood, personal rights, and command over property
Women and men are guaranteed reproductive rights
Women and men are guaranteed equal pay for equal work
Women and men are guaranteed the right to live lives free from violence
Gender sensitive laws and constitutional previsions
Comment

 

Unlike many other nations, the United Kingdom has no single constitutional document, and is instead the sum of laws and principles that make up the "unwritten" constitution of the United Kingdom. The Constitution guarantees equal treatment based on gender, as wlell as provisions for potential positive action based on gender.

The UK Government has established an Inter-Ministerial Group on Equalities to develop and oversee implementation of a strategy to deliver the Government's equality commitments (2011), as well as a multi-agency statutory guidance on female genital mutilation (2016). The UK Government has also developed a strategy to end violence against women and girls (operational from 2016 through 2020).

In 2017, Regulations SI 2017/172 was added to the Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information). These regulations set out a standard mechanism for companies to report and publish details on gender pay gap. 

In 2018, the United Kingdom made progress improved the legal framework surrounding domestic abuse. Scotland passed the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act of 2018 in February 2018, which makes all domestic abuse towards a partner, whether psychological or physical, a criminal offence. Offenders could face up to 14 years in prison. (The law went into effect in April 2019.) Throughout 2018, the UK government conducted research and consultations on the economic and social cost of domestic abuse in the lead up to its publication of a draft bill on domestic abuse. The UK Government sought views from victims, support organisations and frontline professionals, to harness their knowledge and expertise. The consultation received over 3,200 responses from across the UK. During the consultation period, events were held across England and Wales, engaging over 1,000 people. (The draft bill was published on January 31, 2019. Though it represents a clear step forward, the draft bill is characterised by gaps and fundamental misconceptions in key areas.)

Methodology8 - 100%
7 - 87.5%
6 - 75%
5 - 62.5%
4 - 50%
3 - 37.5%
2 - 25%
1 - 12.5%
0 - 0%

Necessary legal framework is determined in accordance with the principles of the core human rights treaties (i.e.: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)).
Resources

  1. "United Kingdom's Seventh Periodic Report," CEDAW, June 2011. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  2. 2010 to 2015 government policy: violence against women and girls," Government of UK, 2016. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  3. "Equality and Human Rights Commission," Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2015. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

  4. "Government publishes landmark domestic abuse bill," Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

100.0%
Access to Justice

CriteriaWomen's unrestricted access to justice exists.
Analysis/Comments
Analysis The following protections are guaranteed by the United Kingdom in 2018:
Equal access to formal legal dispute systems and the right to legal representation
Non-discrimination law
Existence of courts and judicial bodies
Financial affordability of access to legal proceedings and/or legal aid
Free access to an interpreter during legal proceedings
Victim protection
Existence of gender units within justice institutions
Comment

This section examines access to fundamental rights, criminal and civil justice, protections guaranteeing the access to these institutions (and against retaliation for accessing these institutions) without discrimination. 

According to the World Justice Project's (WJP's) 2019 report on citizens' access to justice in 2018, the United Kingdom was ranked 12 out of 126 states. As it relates to civil justice (a category which includes financial affordability, economic barriers to access and freedom from discrimination), the United Kingdom is ranked 18 out of 126. As it relates to criminal justice, the United Kingdom is ranked 9 of 126. As it relates to fundamental rights, the United Kingdom is ranked 11 of 126. 

The Equality Act (2010) protects against discrimination across nine characteristics, including sex, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity and marriage or civil partnership (in employment only). Guidance notes, resources and related informational materials are widely available both through government and nonprofit providers. (For example: Citizen's Advice, a national charity and a network of over 280 independent local Citizens Advice members, maintains a helpline that provides advice and information on discrimination.) 

The right to an interpreter is a principle of English common law. Translation services are currently being provided within police stations and the Courts by 'The Big Word', who are contracted by the Ministry of Justice. The struggle to meet the demand for interpreters (and citizens' concerns surrounding the privatisation of these services) is well documented.

MethodologyThe necessary protections represent the CEDAW standard on women's access to justice.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%"
Resources

  1. Rule of Law Index Report: 2019," The World Justice Project, 2019 [The United Kingdom, p. 151]. Accessed June 10, 2019. 
  2. "Equality Act 2010 - discrimination and your rights," Citizen's Advice, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019. 
  3. "Structure of the courts and tribunal system," Courts and the Tribunals Judiciary, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019. 
  4. "Witness protection and anonymity," The Crown Prosecution Service, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2019. 
  5. "Thousands of court cases adjourned due to failures in interpreting services," The Guardian, 2016. Accessed June 10, 2019.

100.0%
Protections Against Human Trafficking

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2018 is in:
Complete compliance with the minimum standards
Partial compliance with the minimum standards
Non-compliance with the minimum standards
Comment

 

According to the 2018 Trafficking in Persons Report's minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking, the Government of the United Kingdom is in “full compliance.”  

MethodologyAdherence is measured in accordance with the “Palermo Protocols” and grading system developed by the US state Department’s annual report on trafficking in persons.
Full compliance: 100%
Partial Compliance: 50%
Non-Compliance: 0%

Resources

  1. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report," The United States Department of State, 2018 [UK at pps. 440-442]. Accessed June 10, 2019. [Full report]

  2. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report: United Kingdom," The United States Department of State, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2019. [United Kingdom only]

  3. "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime," United Nations, 2000. Accessed August 12, 2019.

Researcher's Note: the 2018 Trafficking in Persons Report covers government efforts to combat human trafficking undertaken from April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. Reports are typically released in June.

100.0%
Protections Against Sexual Violence.

CriteriaA state should be in compliance with minimum standards for the elimination of sexual violence.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2018 has the following services in place:
Existence of a law against sexual violence
Governmental efforts to eliminate sexual violence nationally
Existence of a national crisis hotline
Existence of women's shelters
Existence of women's rape crisis centres
Comment

In March 2016 the British Home Secretary published the UK National Strategy on Violence Against Women for the period of 2016-2020. This strategy includes 80 million GBP in funding to support rape crisis centres, shelters, and local prevention programmes. The main goals of the strategy are to increase reporting, reform the justice system's response to sexual and gender based violence, support local commissioners, address trafficking in persons, and overall improve intervention and the prevention of abuse.

MethodologyThe standard is derived from the CEDAW and Istanbul Convention.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%
Resources
  1. "All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual Violence report into the Funding and Commissioning of Sexual Violence and Abuse Services 2018," All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual Violence, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  2. "Helpline Supporters," Women's Aid and Refuge, 2012. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  3. "Help after rape and sexual assault," The National Health Service, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019.

  4. "Safe at Last: Inside a Women's Refuge," The Guardian, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  5. "Dangerous Persons Database - ViSOR," The National Policing Improvement Agency, 2009. Accessed June 11, 2019.

95.0%
Recovery Support

80.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes Serving the Needs of Veterans

CriteriaDedicated programmes for female veterans should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2018 provides the following services:
Female veterans affairs offices exist in urban and rural areas
Economic benefits (i.e. disability, housing) exist
Health service benefits (i.e. free veterans health insurance, gender-sensitive PTSD care) exist
Educational benefits exist
Employment services exist
Comment

 

The United Kingdom falls short of meeting the minimum standards for the provision of recovery support.

The UK's Veterans Welfare Service (VWS, part of the Ministry of Defence (MOD)) operates four VWS Centres across the United Kingdom. In 2018, the United Kingdom did not have designated woman veterans affairs offices or bureaus. The VWS does, however, host a number of protocols guiding economic benefits (ex: pension schemes and compensation payments for those injured or bereaved through service), health service benefits (particularly for those with " leavers who have severe physical or psychological disablement "), educational benefits (ex: the MOD is largest deliverer of apprenticeships in the UK) and employment benefits (ex: provision of access to one-to-one guidance, training and employment opportunities for two years following exit, based on an eligibility related to length of service.  

In 2018, the MOD's provision of services to women veterans was characterised by the absence of discussion and thinking concerning the specific support needs of women veterans. The absence of such discussions have consequences. The SSAFA conducted a survey of 251 veterans aged 18 - 45, and the results were that clear: nearly half of women veterans feel less supported than male veterans.

It is also clear that, though the UK Government "ticks the boxes" for most of the Scorecard  indicators, the MOD has shifted much of its veterans' welfare service provision responsibilities to civil society organisations.

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the international concept of the responsibility to protect. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
5 - 100%
4 - 80%
3 - 60%
2 - 40%
1 - 20%
0 - 0%

Resources

  1. "Female veterans feel less supported than men," SSAFA: The Armed Forces Charity, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  2. "Female veterans feel less supported on Civvy street than their male equivalents," The Military Times, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  3. "Veterans Welfare Service," Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  4. "The Strategy for our Veterans - UK Government Consultation Paper," Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019.

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Sexual Violence

CriteriaDedicated programmes for survivors of sexual violence should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2018 provides the following services:
National crisis hotline
Women's shelters
Women's rape crisis centres
Counseling services
National sex-offender list or website
Support groups for victims/survivors
Comment

The National Domestic Violence Helpline, run in partnership between Women's Aid and Refuge, is operational 24/7 and free of charge. The National Domestic Violence Helpline receives support from the UK Government (including the Department of Health and Home Office). Rape Crisis also operates a national helpline, which is free of charge and operational from 12:00 -2.30 pm and 7:00 - 9.30 pm every day of the year, which receives funds from the UK Government. (There are a number of other helplines providing support to survivors of sexual violence that receive funding from the UK Government.) The National Health Service directs survivors to these (as well as other) services. 

There are 302 serving the whole of England and Wales. One in six shelters have closed due to lack of funding in the past eight years.

In 2018, there were 44 autonomous Rape Crisis Centres (for which Rape Crisis serves as an umbrella body). In 2017-18, 6,355 victims and survivors awaited access support from Rape Crisis Centres. Waiting lists for counselling typically ranged from 3 to 14 months, with numerous other services closing their waiting lists altogether due to an absence of funding to clear them within the period of the contract. 

It is critical to note though, as emphasised in the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual Violence's 2018 report, that "overall funding received by specialist sexual violence and abuse services has in no way kept pace with, and continues to be completely disproportionate to, the high levels of demand they face."

The UK operates a Violent and Sex Offender Register (ViSOR),  a records database of those who are required to register with the police under the Sexual Offenses Act 2003, jailed for over a year for violent offences and/or considered at risk of reoffending. The database for use only by police forces and is not publicly accessible.

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the CEDAW, Istanbul Convention and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
6 - 100%
5 - 83%
4 - 66%
3 - 49%
2 - 32%
1 - 15%
0 - 0%.
Resources

  1. "Helpline Supporters," Women's Aid and Refuge, 2012. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  2. "Rape Crisis Services," Rape Crisis, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  3. "Help after rape and sexual assault," The National Health Service, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019.

  4. "Safe at Last: Inside a Women's Refuge," The Guardian, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  5. "UK National Strategy on Violence Against Women 2016-2020," Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, 2016. Accessed June 10, 2019. 

100.0%
Implementation of Dedicated Programmes to Support Survivors of Human Trafficking

CriteriaDedicated programmes for urvivors of human trafficking should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2018 provides the following services:
Human trafficking hotline
Human trafficking shelter
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.)
Health services
Legal services
Job training programmes
Educational services
Comment

The Salvation Army and the Modern Slavery Foundation run helplines that are The Salvation Army and the Modern Slavery Foundation run helplines that are operational 24/7. In 2018, there was a single operational women's anti-trafficking emergency  safehouse in the UK, run by Unseen. 24/7. In 2018, there was a single operational women's anti-trafafehouse in the U.K, run by Unseen. 

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with Palermo Protocol and Beijing Platform for Action. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources

  1. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report," The United States Department of State, 2018 [UK at pps. 440-442]. Accessed June 10, 2019. [Full report]

  2. "2018 Trafficking in Persons Report: United Kingdom," The United States Department of State, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2019. [United Kingdom only]

**Researcher's Note: the 2018 Trafficking in Persons Report covers government efforts to combat human trafficking undertaken from April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. Reports are typically released in June.

  1. "Annual Assessment 2018," Modern Day Slavery, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  2. "Modern Slavery," The Salvation Army, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

"What We Do/ Women's Safehouse," Unseen, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019.

100.0%
Implementation Dedicated Programmes to Support Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)

CriteriaDedicated programmes for refugees, asylum seekers, and IDPs should be in place.
Analysis/Comments
AnalysisThe United Kingdom in 2018 provides the following services:
State refugee/IDP strategy exists
Basic necessities (food, clothing, housing, etc.) are provided
Health services are available
Legal services are available
Job training programmes are available
Educational services are available
Community engagement/integration programmes are available
Comment

 

In 2018, the UK received applications for asylum for 37,453 people (including dependents), significantly fewer than Germany (162,000), France (110,000), Greece (65,000) and Italy (49,000). The UK offered protection (grants of asylum, alternative forms of protection and resettlement) to 15,891 people in 2018 (up 8% compared with the previous year). 

According to UNHCR statistics, by mid-2018 there were 124,018 refugees, 33,035 pending asylum cases and 106 stateless persons in the UK.

In 2018, 5,806 people were resettled in the UK, (7% fewer than the previous year), including 4,407 under the VPRS, 688 under the VCRS.

MethodologyThe standard is determined in line with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) recommendations. A state receives a full point only when it is in full compliance with the determined obligation.
7 - 100%
6 - 85%
5 - 70%
4 - 55%
3 - 40%
2 - 25%
1 - 10%
0 - 0%

Resources

  1. "Refugee Facts and Figures," British Red Cross, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  2. "Asylum in the UK," The United Nations Refugee Agency, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2019. 

  3. "Refugee Law and Policy: United Kingdom," Library of Congress, 2016. Accessed June 11, 2019.